Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506845›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2020

Comparison of cerebrovascular reactivity recovery following high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training.

Joel S Burma, Alannah Macaulay, Paige Copeland, Omeet Khatra, Kevin J Bouliane, Jonathan D Smirl

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Can Alterations in Cerebrovascular COJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Neurovascular coupling on trial: How the number of trials completed impacts the accuracy and precision of temporally derived neurovascular coupling estimates.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joel S BurmaSport Concussion Research Lab, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Alannah MacaulaySport Concussion Research Lab, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Paige CopelandSport Concussion Research Lab, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Omeet KhatraFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kevin J BoulianeSport Concussion Research Lab, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Jonathan D SmirlSport Concussion Research Lab, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-0038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common inclusion criterion when assessing cerebrovascular (CVR) metrics is for individuals to abstain from exercise for 12-24 hr prior to data collections. While several studies have examined CVR during exercise, the literature describing CVR throughout post-exercise recovery is sparse. The current investigation examined CVR measurements in nine participants (seven male) before and for 8 hr following three conditions: 45-min moderate-continuous exercise (at ~50% heart-rate reserve), 25-min high-intensity intervals (ten, one-minute intervals at ~85% heart-rate reserve), and a control day (30-min quiet rest). The hypercapnic (40-60 mmHg) and hypocapnic (25-40 mmHg) slopes were assessed via a modified rebreathing technique and controlled stepwise hyperventilation, respectively. All testing was initiated at 8:00a.m. with transcranial Doppler ultrasound measurements to index cerebral blood velocity performed prior to the condition (pre) with serial follow-ups at zero, one, two, four, six, and eight hours within the middle and posterior cerebral artery (MCA, PCA). Absolute and relative MCA and PCA hypercapnic slopes were attenuated following high-intensity intervals at hours zero and one (all p < .02). No alterations were observed in either hypocapnic or hypercapnic slopes following the control or moderate-continuous exercise (all p > .13), aside from a reduced relative hypercapnic MCA slope at hours zero and one following moderate-continuous exercise (all p < .005). The current findings indicate the common inclusion criteria of a 12-24 hr time restriction on exercise can be reduced to two hours when performing CVR measures. Furthermore, the consistent nature of the CVR indices throughout the control day indicate reproducible testing sessions can be made between 8:00a.m. and 7:00p.m.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingRespirationAdultBrainCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHeart RateHumansHypercapniaHypocapniaMaleUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialYoung Adultacute recoverycerebral blood flowcerebrovascular reactivityexercisehyperventilationrebreathing

Identifiers

PMID32506845
PMCPMC7276190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.