Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506746›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2020

Practical implementation of frailty models in Mendelian risk prediction.

Theodore Huang, Malka Gorfine, Li Hsu, Giovanni Parmigiani, Danielle Braun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A validation of models for prediction of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Theodore HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-6999
Malka GorfineDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1577-6624
Li HsuDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-8168-4712
Giovanni ParmigianiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8783-5961
Danielle BraunDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5177-8598
Harvard University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI A. Heather Eliassen · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
Statistical Methods for Analysis of Tumor Heterogeneity in Genetic EpidemiologyR01CA189532 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
Statistical Methods for Genetic Epidemiology StudiesR01CA195789 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189532NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195789NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous statistical models used to identify individuals at high risk of cancer due to inherited mutations. Mendelian models predict future risk of cancer by using family history with estimated cancer penetrances (age- and sex-specific risk of cancer given the genotype of the mutations) and mutation prevalences. However, there is often residual risk heterogeneity across families even after accounting for the mutations in the model, due to environmental or unobserved genetic risk factors. We aim to improve Mendelian risk prediction by incorporating a frailty model that contains a family-specific frailty vector, impacting the cancer hazard function, to account for this heterogeneity. We use a discrete uniform population frailty distribution and implement a marginalized approach that averages each family's risk predictions over the family's frailty distribution. We apply the proposed approach to improve breast cancer prediction in BRCAPRO, a Mendelian model that accounts for inherited mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to predict breast and ovarian cancer. We evaluate the proposed model's performance in simulations and real data from the Cancer Genetics Network and show improvements in model calibration and discrimination. We also discuss alternative approaches for incorporating frailties and their strengths and limitations.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansMaleModels, StatisticalMutationRisk Factorsfamily historyfrailty modelmendelian risk predictionsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID32506746
PMCPMC7895423
OpenAlexW3033473468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.