Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506627›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2020

Reflex cytology for triage of high-risk human papillomavirus positive self-sampled material in cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study.

D L Loopik, Wjg Melchers, Jem Vedder, Ajc van den Brule, Lfag Massuger, Rlm Bekkers, A G Siebers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human Papillomavirus Genotype Detection and Cytology Using a New Self-Sampling Method.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D L LoopikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wjg MelchersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jem VedderDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ajc van den BruleDepartment of Pathology, Lab for Molecular Diagnostics, Pathologie-DNA, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Lfag MassugerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rlm BekkersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
A G SiebersDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLNationwide Mutual Insurance Company (United States) · USRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh-risk human papillomavirus (HrHPV)-positive women detected by self-sampling require an extra visit at the general practitioner for additional cytology testing, but the loss to follow up within this triage is substantial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of reflex cytology on hrHPV-positive self-samples for immediate stratification of women who need referral for colposcopy.

designA prospective cohort study.

settingTwo Dutch cervical cancer-screening laboratories. POPULATION: 1014 screenees who tested hrHPV-positive on self-samples between 1 December 2018 and 1 August 2019.

methodsSelf-samples were directly used for cytological analysis. Cytological and histological outcomes during follow up were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA).

main outcome measuresTest performance of reflex cytology on self-samples was determined for different thresholds and compared with physician-taken cytology and histological outcomes.

resultsReflex cytology on self-samples for detecting abnormal cytology showed a sensitivity of 26.4% (95% CI 21.8-31.3) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI 87.7-92.8). Of all ≥CIN2 cases, 29.4% (95% CI 22.5-37.1) were detected with reflex cytology on self-samples. The positive predictive value for detection of ≥CIN2 was higher with cytology on self-collected samples than on physician-collected samples. Of women who were lost to follow up, 12.9% were found to have abnormal cytology on their self-sampled material.

conclusionCytology testing is achievable on hrHPV-positive self-samples, could decrease the loss to follow up in screening and is easily implementable in the current clinical practice. Of all hrHPV-positive women with abnormal cytology on additional physician-collected samples, 26.4% could have been directly referred for colposcopy if triage with reflex cytology on self-sampled material had been performed. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Reflex cytology for triage of hrHPV

Indexed as

Self CareSpecimen HandlingAdultAlgorithmsCohort StudiesCytodiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasiahuman papillomavirusscreeningself-samplingtriage

Identifiers

PMID32506627
PMCPMC7689810
OpenAlexW3146587051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.