ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and pollution: a spatial investigation.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Government environmental governance, fiscal decentralization, and carbon intensity of the construction industry.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Effect of Chinese Environmental Regulation on Corporate Sustainability Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The effect of fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and economic development on haze pollution: empirical evidence for 270 Chinese cities during 2007-2016.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Can environmental regulations break down domestic market segmentation? Evidence from China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Industrial ecological efficiency of cities in the Yellow River Basin in the background of China's economic transformation: spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Controlling environmental pollution: dynamic role of fiscal decentralization in COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Vertical environmental protection pressure, fiscal pressure, and local environmental regulations: evidence from China's industrial sulfur dioxide treatment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- An evolutionary analysis of corruption in the process of collecting environmental tax in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Do fiscal decentralization and natural resources rent curb carbon emissions? Evidence from developed countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- The nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: from the perspective of biased technological progress.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- The Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Green Economic Efficiency: A Study Based on the Provinces in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Relationship between FDI, fiscal expenditure and green total-factor productivity in China: From the perspective of spatial spillover.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effects of regulation on environmental pollution under Chinese-style fiscal decentralization, this research analyzes annual data over the period 2003 to 2017 covering 30 provinces in China with the spatial economic model. The empirical results show significant spatial agglomeration effects on the emissions of wastewater, sulfur dioxide, and solid waste. Environmental regulation helps reduce discharge of wastewater and solid waste, but does not help reduce the emission of sulfur dioxide; because there is significantly positive externality in treating pollutants with high fluidity, cost is larger than revenue for local governments. The relationship between fiscal decentralization and pollutants shapes an inverted U-shaped curve. We finally offer some implications in accordance with our empirical finding, such as the intensity of environmental regulation should be suitable for economic development, different measures should be taken based on the fluidity of pollutants, and a new evaluation system should be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32506410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.