ArticleHead and neck pathology2020
Retrospective Study of Buccal Mucosal Salivary Neoplasms.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Canalicular Adenomas of Minor Salivary Glands: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pedunculated Pleomorphic Adenoma With Adipocytic Metaplasia of the Hard Palate: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Intraoral Salivary Gland Cystadenomas: A Case Series Study and Literature Review.Head and neck pathology · 2024Review
- Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Oral Cavity: Systematic Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023Article
- Distribution and Frequency of Salivary Gland Tumours: An International Multicenter Study.Head and neck pathology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salivary gland neoplasms of the buccal mucosa are relatively rare and often present with an unusual histopathologic profile when compared with other intraoral locations. We present a series of minor salivary gland neoplasms of the buccal mucosa and discuss demographics, clinical presentation, and histologic findings. An IRB approved retrospective search of University of Florida Oral Pathology Biopsy Service archive from 1994 to 2018 for all salivary gland neoplasms of the buccal mucosa was undertaken. Data related to age, gender, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and category of neoplasm recorded. Review for consensus of diagnosis and immunohistochemical (IHC) testing on current diagnostic standards was performed and diagnoses updated based on results. Of 66 cases identified majority were females (72.7%) and age mean was 63 years. Benign tumors were 56.06% and 43.94% malignant, with Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) being commonest (26/66, 39.4%), followed by canalicular adenoma (CLA) (14/66, 21.2%), ductal papilloma (DP) (10/66, 15.2%), cystadenoma (CA) (8/66, 12.1%), basal cell adenoma (BCA) (4/66, 6.1%), and 1(1.5%) each for pleomorphic adenoma (PA), secretory carcinoma (SC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (ACNOS). This study with respect to demographics and percentage of benign and malignant buccal mucosal salivary gland neoplasms is in conformity with the literature. It underscores the fact that both benign and malignant salivary gland neoplasms should be included in the differential diagnosis of submucosal buccal masses. Future larger multicenter studies with detailed treatment and outcomes data may aid and assist in further understanding the behavior, diverse histomorphology and prognosis of these neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.