ReviewWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2021
Assessment of left-ventricular diastolic function in pediatric intensive-care patients: a review of parameters and indications compared with those for adults.
Review in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Normal ranges of left atrial phasic strains and strain rates by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Nt-Pro-Bnp in Predicting Outcome in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Approaches in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Children: Present and Future.Paediatric drugs · 2022Review
- Diastolic Dysfunction in Neonates With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy During Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Tissue Doppler Study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of diastolic heart failure has increased over time. The evaluation of left-ventricular diastolic function is complex, ongoing, and remains poorly performed in pediatric intensive-care patients. This study aimed to review the literature and to provide an update on the evaluation of left-ventricular diastolic function in adults and children in intensive care. DATA SOURCES: We searched data from PubMed/Medline. Thirty-two studies were included. Four pragmatic questions were identified: (1) What is the physiopathology of diastolic dysfunction? (2) Which tools are required to evaluate diastolic function? (3) What are the echocardiographic criteria needed to evaluate diastolic function? (4) When should diastolic function be evaluated in pediatric intensive care?
resultsEarly diastole allows characterization of relaxation, whereas compliance assessments and filling pressures are evaluated during late diastole. The evolution of diastolic function differs between adults and children. Unlike in adults, decreased compliance occurs at the same time as delayed relaxation in children. Diastolic function can be evaluated by Doppler echocardiography. The echocardiographic criteria for ventricular relaxation include the E wave, E/A wave ratio, and isovolumic relaxation time. Ventricular compliance can be assessed by the E/e' wave ratio, atrial volume, and Ap wave duration during pulmonary vein flow. In adult intensive-care patients, the E/e' ratio can be used as an index of tolerance for volume expansion in septic patients and to adjust the inotropic support.
conclusionClinical studies would allow some of these parameters to be validated for use in children in intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.