ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Clinical effectiveness of iguratimod based on real-world data of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Effectiveness of tofacitinib combined with iguratimod in the treatment of difficult-to-treat moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIguratimod (IGU) is a conventional synthetic disease-modifying drug that has been approved based on its additive effects with methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of the study is to establish the effectiveness of IGU with versus IGU without MTX irrespective of whether MTX is well tolerated or not by the patients.
methodsDisease activity scores in 177 RA patients treated using IGU were retrospectively evaluated at baseline and after 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and adverse events (AEs) were noted.
resultsIGU reduced the disease activity parameters, disease activity score (DAS)-ESR, DAS-CRP, the simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and clinical disease activity index (CDAI) in the concomitant MTX and non-MTX, female and male, and young and elderly patient groups after 24 weeks. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IGU was more effective with concomitant MTX and in elderly and male patients. Severe AEs were observed only in the elderly group: two cases of pneumonia, 1 of pneumocystis pneumonia, 1 of heart failure, and 1 of salivary gland adenoma.
conclusionsIGU is effective for RA, especially with concomitant MTX, and in elderly and male patients. Key Points • Iguratimod is effective for RA, especially with concomitant MTX, and in elderly and male patients. • Since all serious adverse events were in the elderly group in this study, sufficient monitoring for adverse events, especially for elderly RA patients, is needed during iguratimod therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.