ArticleGenes & genomics2020
A new metagenome binning method based on gene uniqueness.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe human gut microbiome contains millions of genes and many undetected bacteria species. Recovering bacterial genomes from large complex metagenomes remains highly challenging, and current binning methods show insufficient recall rates.
objectiveThis study was performed to put forward a new metagenome binning method with promising recall rate and accuracy.
methodsWe found that more than 85% of the genes could be aligned to only one bacteria species by using strict BLAST parameters (identity > 90% and aligning length > 100 bp). This phenomenon was called "the gene uniqueness", which indicated that the most bacterial genes could be exclusive to the species' taxonomy. In our new metagenome binning method, we could cluster contigs based on gene similarity via a graph model. Any contig shared with same gene under Strict Blast parameters would be clustered into one bin.
resultswe obtained 1,131 bins and reconstructed the genomes of 12 unknown species for MetaHIT data Our method exhibited a more promising recall rate, faster running speed and lower time complexity than the current methods.
conclusionsThe present new metagenome binning method based on gene uniqueness had high recall rate and low error, which could be applied to assemble the bacterial genomes efficiently in complex metagenome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.