Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506233›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

Does acute stress influence the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effect? Implications for substance use disorders.

Sabine Steins-Loeber, Frank Lörsch, Caroline van der Velde, Astrid Müller, Matthias Brand, Theodora Duka, Oliver T Wolf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine Steins-LoeberDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg, Markusplatz 3, 96047, Bamberg, Germany. sabine.steins-loeber@uni-bamberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-0627
Frank LörschDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg, Markusplatz 3, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Caroline van der VeldeDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg, Markusplatz 3, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Astrid MüllerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Matthias BrandDepartment of General Psychology: Cognition, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Theodora DukaSussex Addiction Research and Intervention Centre, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Oliver T WolfDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
University of Bamberg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalThe ability of conditioned stimuli to affect instrumental responding is a robust finding from animal as well as human research and is assumed as a key factor regarding the development and maintenance of addictive behaviour.

objectivesWhile it is well known that stress is an important factor for relapse after treatment, little is known about the impact of stress on conditioned substance-associated stimuli and their influence on instrumental responding.

methodsWe administered in the present study a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm with stimuli associated with smoking- and chocolate-related rewards using points in a token economy to light to moderate smokers who also indicated to like eating chocolate. After completion of the first two phases of the PIT paradigm (i.e. Pavlovian training and instrumental trainings), participants were randomly allocated to the socially evaluated cold pressor test or a control condition before the final phase of the PIT paradigm, the transfer phase, was administered.

resultsThe presentation of a smoking-related stimulus enhanced instrumental responding for a smoking-related reward (i.e. 'smoking-PIT' effect) and presentation of a chocolate-related stimulus for a chocolate-related reward (i.e. 'chocolate-PIT' effect) in participants aware of the experimental contingencies as indicated by expectancy ratings. However, acute stress did not change (i.e. neither enhanced nor attenuated) the 'smoking-PIT' effect or the 'chocolate-PIT' effect, and no overall effect of acute stress on tobacco choice was observed in aware participants.

conclusionsThe established role of stress in addiction appears not to be driven by an augmenting effect on the ability of drug stimuli to promote drug-seeking.

Indexed as

RewardAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCold TemperatureConditioning, ClassicalFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMaleRandom AllocationStress, PsychologicalSubstance-Related DisordersTransfer, PsychologyHydrocortisoneAddictionNicotine dependenceSocially evaluated cold pressor test

Identifiers

PMID32506233
PMCPMC7351872
OpenAlexW3033585723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.