Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506229›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study.

Hiroshi Yabusaki, Yasuhiro Kodera, Norimasa Fukushima, Naoki Hiki, Shinichi Kinami, Masashi Yoshida, Keishiro Aoyagi, Shuichi Ota, Hiroaki Hata, Hiroshi Noro and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi YabusakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, 2-15-3, kawagishicho, chuoku, Niigata, 951-8566, Japan. yabu@niigata-cc.jp.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Norimasa FukushimaDepartment of Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Naoki HikiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shinichi KinamiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa, Japan.
Masashi YoshidaDepartment of Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan.
Keishiro AoyagiDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Shuichi OtaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Saiseikai - Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki HataDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyoto Medical Centre, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroshi NoroDepartment of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization (JCHO), Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi OshioFaculty of Letters, Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji NakadaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato, Tokyo, Japan.
International University of Health and Welfare · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKitasato University · JPKurume University · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPNagoya University · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPOsaka Hospital · JPSaiseikai Ibaraki Hospital · JPWaseda University · JPYamagata Prefectural Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for early cancer in the upper third of the stomach, owing to reportedly superior quality of life (QOL) after PG when compared with total gastrectomy. However, various methods of reconstruction have currently been proposed. We compared the postoperative QOL among the three different reconstruction methods after PG using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire.

methodsPost Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Study (PGSAS), a nationwide multi-institutional survey, was conducted to evaluate QOL using the PGSAS-45 among various types of gastrectomy. Of the 2,368 eligible data from the PGSAS survey, data from 193 patients who underwent PG were retrieved and used in the current study. The PGSAS-45 consists of 45 items including 22 original gastrectomy specific items in addition to the SF-8 and GSRS. These were consolidated into 19 main outcome measures pertaining postgastrectomy symptoms, amount of food ingested, quality of ingestion, work, and level of satisfaction for daily work, and the three reconstruction methods (n = 193; 115 esophago-gastrostomy [PGEG], 34 jejunal interposition [PGJI], and 44 jejunal pouch interposition [PGJPI]) were compared using PGSAS-45.

resultsSize of the remnant stomach was significantly larger in PGEG, and significantly smaller in PGJI and PGJPI (P < 0.05). There was no difference in other patient background factors among the groups. EGJPI tended to be superior to PGEG in several of the 19 main outcome with marginal significance (P = 0.047-0.076).

conclusionPGJPI appears to be the most favorable of the three reconstruction methods after PG especially when the size of remnant stomach is rather small. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR #000002116 entitled as "A study to observe correlation between resection and reconstruction procedures employed for gastric neoplasms and development of postgastrectomy syndrome".

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyGastric StumpHumansJejunumMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostgastrectomy SyndromesStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32506229
PMCPMC7458934
OpenAlexW3033580027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.