Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506227›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2020

The efficacy in treatment of facial melasma with thulium 1927-nm fractional laser-assisted topical tranexamic acid delivery: a split-face, double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study.

Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha, Francesca Sy-Alvarado, Poramin Patthamalai, Thanya Techapichetvanich, Sasima Eimpunth, Woraphong Manuskiatti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Energy-Based Devices for the Treatment of Facial Skin Conditions in Skin of Color.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Update on Melasma-Part II: Treatment.Dermatology and therapy · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rungsima WanitphakdeedechaDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. rungsima.wan@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3926-2193
Francesca Sy-AlvaradoSection of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Poramin PatthamalaiDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Thanya TechapichetvanichDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sasima EimpunthDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Woraphong ManuskiattiDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Siriraj Hospital · THPhilippine General Hospital · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This split-face, double-blind, randomized controlled study examines the efficacy of fractional thulium laser (FTL)-assisted delivery of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) compared with FTL alone as a treatment option for melasma. Forty-six adults with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and recalcitrant melasma underwent four weekly treatments with fractional 1927-nm thulium laser on both sides of the face. Immediately after treatment, TXA was applied to one side of the face and normal saline solution (NSS) to the contralateral side as control under occlusion. Melanin index (MI), modified MASI (mMASI), and patients' self-assessed improvement scores were measured at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3- and 6 months after the final treatment and were examined statistically with a paired sample t test with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. The majority of the participants (95.7%, n = 44) were female with Fitzpatrick skin type IV (82.6%) and a mean age of 48.0 ± 10.0 years. Twenty-nine individuals were able to be followed up until the 6-month assessment. Significant improvement from baseline was seen in both the MI and mMASI scores for both the TXA and control sides at 3 months, with no statistically significant difference between sides. By the 6th month, significant differences in MI and mMASI scores from baseline were still noted, except in the MI for controls. The patients' self-assessment showed similar patterns. No serious adverse events were reported for either group. A regimen of FTL-assisted delivery of TXA over a 4-week period is a safe and effective treatment option for melasma, producing significant improvement up to 3 months. Results further would suggest a repeat regimen every 3 months could be useful for treatment of recalcitrant melasma.

Indexed as

LasersAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMelaninsMelanosisMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsThuliumTranexamic AcidTreatment OutcomeMelaninsThuliumTranexamic AcidFractional laserMelasmaTranexamic acidTransepidermal drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID32506227
OpenAlexW3033777536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.