Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506200›Full record

ArticleAngiogenesis2020

Arterial endoglin does not protect against arteriovenous malformations.

Esha Singh, Rachael E Redgrave, Helen M Phillips, Helen M Arthur

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angiogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gene-Specific Endothelial Programs Drive AVM Pathogenesis inArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. TGF-β superfamily co-receptors in cancer.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esha SinghCentre for Life, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 3BZ, UK.
Rachael E RedgraveCentre for Life, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 3BZ, UK.
Helen M PhillipsCentre for Life, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 3BZ, UK.
Helen M ArthurCentre for Life, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 3BZ, UK. helen.arthur@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6522-1363
Centre for Life · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/14/86/31177British Heart Foundation PG/18/25/33587British Heart Foundation PG/18/32/33760British Heart Foundation PG/18/57/33941British Heart Foundation RG/12/2/29416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoglin (ENG) forms a receptor complex with ALK1 in endothelial cells (ECs) to promote BMP9/10 signalling. Loss of function mutations in either ENG or ALK1 genes lead to the inherited vascular disorder hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), characterised by arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the vessel-specific role of ENG and ALK1 proteins in protecting against AVMs is unclear. For example, AVMs have been described to initiate in arterioles, whereas ENG is predominantly expressed in venous ECs. To investigate whether ENG has any arterial involvement in protecting against AVM formation, we specifically depleted the Eng gene in venous and capillary endothelium whilst maintaining arterial expression, and investigated how this affected the incidence and location of AVMs in comparison with pan-endothelial Eng knockdown.

methodsUsing the mouse neonatal retinal model of angiogenesis, we first established the earliest time point at which Apj-Cre-ERT2 activity was present in venous and capillary ECs but absent from arterial ECs. We then compared the incidence of AVMs following pan-endothelial or venous/capillary-specific ENG knockout.

resultsActivation of Apj-Cre-ERT2 with tamoxifen from postnatal day (P) 5 ensured preservation of arterial ENG protein expression. Specific loss of ENG expression in ECs of veins and capillaries led to retinal AVMs at a similar frequency to pan-endothelial loss of ENG. AVMs occurred in the proximal as well as the distal part of the retina consistent with a defect in vascular remodelling during maturation of the vasculature.

conclusionExpression of ENG is not required in arterial ECs to protect against AVM formation.

Indexed as

AnimalsArteriesArteriovenous MalformationsCapillariesEndoglinEndotheliumMice, KnockoutRetinaVeinsEndoglinAcvrl1Arteriovenous malformationHereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasiaNotchRetinal angiogenesis

Identifiers

PMID32506200
PMCPMC7524831
OpenAlexW3033418910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.