ReviewEBioMedicine2020
Stimuli-responsive prodrug-based cancer nanomedicine.
Review in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biocompatibility and Toxicity Evaluation of an Elastin-Based Nanogel Carrier for Enzalutamide: Comprehensive Characterization, Controlled Release and Assessment in Zebrafish Embryos.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- Nanocarrier-based delivery of Pt(IV) compounds for chemoimmunotherapy and theranostics: Advances, challenges, and prospects.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers as Next-Generation on-Demand Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy: Mechanistic Insights, Trigger Modalities, and Translational Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle Strategies for Bone Metastasis Immunotherapy: Targeting, Immune Reprogramming and Combination Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Glutathione responsive nanomedicine leverages tumor redox imbalance for targeted cancer theranostics.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in the applications of stimulus-responsive nanomedicines for anti-cancer therapy.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Arginine Transporters in Human Cancers: Emerging Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Synergistic Interactions of Anthraquinones with Conventional Cancer Therapies.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Review
- A Dual-Mechanism Targeted Cross-Convergence Prodrug Activation Strategy Enabled by Biological Stimulus Amplification toward Precision Cancer Therapy.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- DOX-conjugated unimolecular micelles from benzaldehyde-functionalized star copolymer via metal-free ATRP for pH-responsive drug delivery.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2026Article
- Tailored transethosomal systems for tadalafil transdermal delivery: Impact of Phosal and edge activators on skin permeation and cellular uptake.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Biological Nanocarriers in Cancer Therapy: Cutting Edge Innovations in Precision Drug Delivery.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Challenging and new opportunities for prodrug technology.Investigational new drugs · 2025Review
- Nanomedicines Targeting Metabolic Pathways in the Tumor Microenvironment: Future Perspectives and the Role of AI.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-Based Autophagy Modulation: Multiple Weapons to Inflame Immune Systems and the Tumor Microenvironment.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Smart Cancer Nanomedicine for Synergetic Therapy.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Prospects and Challenges of Chitosan-Based Drug Carriers for Anticancer Agents' Delivery Against Lung Cancer: A Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Design Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Contrast Agents and Nanocarriers for Imaging Proton ExchangeACS nano · 2024Review
- Nanomedicine in glaucoma treatment; Current challenges and future perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of nanotechnology results in the emergence of nanomedicines, but the effective delivery of drugs to tumor sites remains a great challenge. Prodrug-based cancer nanomedicines thus emerged due to their unique advantages, including high drug load efficiency, reduced side effects, efficient targeting, and real-time controllability. A distinctive characteristic of prodrug-based nanomedicines is that they need to be activated by a stimulus or multi-stimulus to produce an anti-tumor effect. A better understanding of various responsive approaches could allow researchers to perceive the mechanism of prodrug-based nanomedicines effectively and further optimize their design strategy. In this review, we highlight the stimuli-responsive pathway of prodrug-based nanomedicines and their anticancer applications. Furthermore, various types of prodrug-based nanomedicines, recent progress and prospects of stimuli-responsive prodrug-based nanomedicines and patient data in the clinical application are also summarized. Additionally, the current development and future challenges of prodrug-based nanomedicines are discussed. We expect that this review will be valuable for readers to gain a deeper understanding of the structure and development of prodrug-based cancer nanomedicines to design rational and effective drugs for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.