ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
A nationwide survey of UK cardiac surgeons' view on clinical decision making during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac surgery on patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ANZ journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Outcomes of COVID-19 infection occurring in the recovery period of the open-heart surgery.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2022Article
- Review
- Cardiac surgery outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A case-series report.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022Article
- Life or limb: an international qualitative study on decision making in sarcoma surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Dissecting the Management and Outcomes of Thoracic Aortovascular Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Annals of vascular surgery · 2021Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on aortic operations.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2021Review
- International study on impact of COVID-19 on cardiac and thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021Review
- COVID 19- Perspective of an Italian Center.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021Review
- Commentary: A survey of UK cardiac surgeons' opinions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A point and place in time.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
- Commentary: Performing cardiac surgery in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era: What is the new normal?The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
- Prioritizing cardiovascular surgical care in COVID-19 pandemic: Shall we operate or defer?Journal of cardiac surgery · 2020Review
- Commentary: Cardiac surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Feeling our way in the dark.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
- An Indian study: impact of COVID-19 on clinical decision-making and consensus in cardiac surgery practice across the country.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo firm recommendations are currently available to guide decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Systematic appraisal of senior surgeons' consensus can be used to generate interim recommendations until data from clinical observations become available. Hence, we aimed to collect and quantitatively appraise nationwide UK consultants' opinions on clinical decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsWe E-mailed a Web-based questionnaire to all consultant cardiac surgeons through the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland mailing list on the April 17, 2020, and we predetermined to close the survey on the April 21, 2020. This survey was primarily designed to gather information on UK surgeons' opinions using 12 items. Strong consensus was predefined as an opinion shared by at least 60% of responding consultants.
resultsA total of 86 consultant surgeons undertook the survey. All UK cardiac units were represented by at least 1 consultant. Strong consensus was achieved for the following key questions: (1) before any hospital admission for cardiac surgery, nasopharyngeal swab, polymerase chain reaction, and computed tomography of the chest should be performed; (2) the use of full personal protective equipment should to be adopted in every case by the theater team regardless of the patient's COVID-19 status; (3) the risk of COVID-19 exposure for patients undergoing heart surgery should be considered moderate to high and likely to increase mortality if it occurs; and (4) cardiac procedures should be decided based on a rapidly convened multidisciplinary team discussion for every patient. The majority believed that both aortic and mitral surgery should be considered in selected cases. The role of coronary artery bypass graft surgery during the pandemic was controversial.
conclusionsIn this unprecedented pandemic period, this survey provides information for generating interim recommendations until data from clinical observations become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.