Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32505456›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020

A nationwide survey of UK cardiac surgeons' view on clinical decision making during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Umberto Benedetto, Andrew Goodwin, Simon Kendall, Rakesh Uppal, Enoch Akowuah

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of COVID-19 on aortic operations.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. COVID 19- Perspective of an Italian Center.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Umberto BenedettoUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: umberto.benedetto@bristol.ac.uk.
Andrew GoodwinSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Simon KendallSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Rakesh UppalBarts Heart Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Enoch AkowuahSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo firm recommendations are currently available to guide decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Systematic appraisal of senior surgeons' consensus can be used to generate interim recommendations until data from clinical observations become available. Hence, we aimed to collect and quantitatively appraise nationwide UK consultants' opinions on clinical decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe E-mailed a Web-based questionnaire to all consultant cardiac surgeons through the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland mailing list on the April 17, 2020, and we predetermined to close the survey on the April 21, 2020. This survey was primarily designed to gather information on UK surgeons' opinions using 12 items. Strong consensus was predefined as an opinion shared by at least 60% of responding consultants.

resultsA total of 86 consultant surgeons undertook the survey. All UK cardiac units were represented by at least 1 consultant. Strong consensus was achieved for the following key questions: (1) before any hospital admission for cardiac surgery, nasopharyngeal swab, polymerase chain reaction, and computed tomography of the chest should be performed; (2) the use of full personal protective equipment should to be adopted in every case by the theater team regardless of the patient's COVID-19 status; (3) the risk of COVID-19 exposure for patients undergoing heart surgery should be considered moderate to high and likely to increase mortality if it occurs; and (4) cardiac procedures should be decided based on a rapidly convened multidisciplinary team discussion for every patient. The majority believed that both aortic and mitral surgery should be considered in selected cases. The role of coronary artery bypass graft surgery during the pandemic was controversial.

conclusionsIn this unprecedented pandemic period, this survey provides information for generating interim recommendations until data from clinical observations become available.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBetacoronavirusClinical Decision-MakingCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSurgeonsCardiac Surgical ProceduresClinical Laboratory TechniquesConsensusCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHealth PolicyHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professionalcardiac surgeryconsensusCOVID-19risksurvey

Identifiers

PMID32505456
PMCPMC7235560
OpenAlexW3024245054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.