Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32505202›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Interactive effects of elevated CO

Rong Zhou, Xiaqing Yu, Junqin Wen, Nikolaj Bjerring Jensen, Thayna Mendanha Dos Santos, Zhen Wu, Eva Rosenqvist, Carl-Otto Ottosen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Impact of Increased COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Feeding the world: impacts of elevated [COHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect of Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms of elevated COPlant cell reports · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rong ZhouDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. rong.zhou@food.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-1258
Xiaqing YuCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Junqin WenCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Nikolaj Bjerring JensenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thayna Mendanha Dos SantosDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Zhen WuCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Eva RosenqvistDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Carl-Otto OttosenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. coo@food.au.dk.
Aarhus University · DKNanjing Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond 30379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtreme weather events are predicted to increase, such as combined heat and drought. The CO

resultsTwo genotypes, 'OuBei' ('OB', Solanum lycopersicum) and 'LA2093' (S. pimpinellifolium) were grown at a [CO

conclusionsShort-term combined stress caused reversible damage on tomato while the e [CO

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisCarbon DioxideDehydrationHeat-Shock ResponsePlant LeavesPlant StomataPlant TranspirationSeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumCarbon DioxideCombined heat and droughtElevated CO2 concentrationPlant physiologyRecoveryTomato

Identifiers

PMID32505202
PMCPMC7276063
OpenAlexW3033149738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.