Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32505119›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Disturbances across whole brain networks during reward anticipation in an abstinent addiction population.

Liam J Nestor, John Suckling, Karen D Ersche, Anna Murphy, John McGonigle, Csaba Orban, Louise M Paterson, Laurence Reed, Eleanor Taylor, Remy Flechais and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The neurobiology of drug addiction: cross-species insights into the dysfunction and recovery of the prefrontal cortex.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liam J NestorNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John SucklingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Karen D ErscheDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anna MurphyNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
John McGonigleNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Csaba OrbanNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Louise M PatersonNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Laurence ReedNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Eleanor TaylorNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Remy FlechaisNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Dana SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Edward T BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rebecca ElliottNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Bill DeakinNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ilan RabinerCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anne-Lingford HughesNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Barbara J SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David J NuttNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
ICCAM Consortium
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G1000018Medical Research Council MC_G0802534Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalent spatial distribution of abnormalities reported in cognitive fMRI studies in addiction suggests there are extensive disruptions across whole brain networks. Studies using resting state have reported disruptions in network connectivity in addiction, but these studies have not revealed characteristics of network functioning during critical psychological processes that are disrupted in addiction populations. Analytic methods that can capture key features of whole brain networks during psychological processes may be more sensitive in revealing additional and widespread neural disturbances in addiction, that are the provisions for relapse risk, and targets for medication development. The current study compared a substance addiction (ADD; n = 83) group in extended abstinence with a control (CON; n = 68) group on functional MRI (voxel-wise activation) and global network (connectivity) measures related to reward anticipation on a monetary incentive delay task. In the absence of group differences on MID performance, the ADD group showed reduced activation predominantly across temporal and visual regions, but not across the striatum. The ADD group also showed disruptions in global network connectivity (lower clustering coefficient and higher characteristic path length), and significantly less connectivity across a sub-network comprising frontal, temporal, limbic and striatal nodes. These results show that an addiction group in extended abstinence exhibit localised disruptions in brain activation, but more extensive disturbances in functional connectivity across whole brain networks. We propose that measures of global network functioning may be more sensitive in highlighting latent and more widespread neural disruptions during critical psychological processes in addiction and other psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAnticipation, PsychologicalBehavior, AddictiveBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationNerve NetSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID32505119
PMCPMC7270610
OpenAlexW3028746144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.