Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504699›Full record

ReviewGastrointestinal endoscopy2020

The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging.

Dennis Yang, Mihir S Wagh, Peter V Draganov

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05468008 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in Western Population

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAdventHealthRan2022 to 2027Enrolled1,000ConditionsEsophageal Lesion, Barrett Esophagus, Gastrointestinal LesionsArmsEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT06376006 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees Using A Standardized Assessment Tool: A Quality Improvement Initiative

TypeobservationalSponsorAdventHealthRan2022 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsCompetence, Assessment, SelfArmsEMR STAT - Survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mentorship in advanced endoscopy: a conversation with Dr Christopher Thompson.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Effective, safe and efficient porcine model of Forrest Ib bleeding gastric and colonic ulcers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis YangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Mihir S WaghDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Peter V DraganovDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landscape of advanced endoscopy continues to evolve as new technologies and techniques become available. Although postgraduate advanced endoscopy fellowships have traditionally centered on ERCP and diagnostic EUS, the breadth of training has increased over the years in response to the ever-growing demand for therapeutic endoscopy. The increasing diversity and complexity of emerging endoscopic techniques accompanied by the shift in focus toward competency-based medical education requires innovative changes to the curriculum that will ensure adequate training yet without compromising best patient practices. The purpose of this review is to highlight the expansive array of advanced endoscopic procedures and the challenges of both defining and measuring competence during training. All authors are interventional endoscopists at their respective institutions performing these complex procedures, as well as training fellows in these techniques. We share our perspectives based on our experience navigating through these issues at our institutions and discuss strategies to standardize training and how to potentially incorporate these measures in the process of credentialing and privileging in endoscopy.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCredentialingCurriculumEndoscopyFellowships and ScholarshipsHumans

Identifiers

PMID32504699
PMCPMC7267783
OpenAlexW3033476169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.