Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504551›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

A broad-spectrum beta-lactam-sparing stewardship program in a middle-income country public hospital: antibiotic use and expenditure outcomes and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles.

Tiago Zequinao, Juliano Gasparetto, Dayana Dos Santos Oliveira, Gabriel Takahara Silva, João Paulo Telles, Felipe Francisco Tuon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiago ZequinaoSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Juliano GasparettoSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Dayana Dos Santos OliveiraSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Gabriel Takahara SilvaSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
João Paulo TellesLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil; AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Felipe Francisco TuonLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Electronic address: felipe.tuon@pucpr.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs are an efficient way to reduce inappropriate use of antimicrobials and costs; however, supporting data are scarce in middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate antibiotic use, bacterial susceptibility profiles, and the economic impact following implementation of a broad-spectrum beta-lactam-sparing antimicrobial stewardship program.

methodsAn interrupted time-series analysis was performed to evaluate antibiotic use and expenditure over a 24-month period (12 months before the antimicrobial stewardship program and in the 12 months after implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program). Antibiotics were classified into one of two groups: beta-lactam antibiotics and beta-lactam-sparing antibiotics. We also compared the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of key pathogens in each period.

resultsBeta-lactam antibiotics use decreased by 43.04 days of therapy/1000 patient-days (p=0.04) immediately following antimicrobial stewardship program implementation, whereas beta-lacta-sparing antibiotics use increased during the intervention period (slope change 6.17 days of therapy/1000 patient-days, p<0.001). Expenditure decreased by $2089.99 (p<0.001) immediately after intervention and was maintained at this level over the intervention period ($-38.45; p=0.24). We also observed that a greater proportion of pathogens were susceptible to cephalosporins and aminoglycosides after the antimicrobial stewardship program.

conclusionsThe antimicrobial stewardship program significantly reduced the use of broad-spectrum beta-lactam-antibiotics associated with a decrease in expenditure and maintenance of the susceptibility profile in Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agentsbeta-LactamsHospitals, PublicAnti-Bacterial AgentsHealth ExpendituresHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsbeta-LactamsAntimicrobial stewardshipHospital settingMiddle-income countryTertiary careTrauma emergency

Identifiers

PMID32504551
PMCPMC9392143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.