Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504543›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2020

Expression of concern: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis.

The Lancet Editors

RetractedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readExpression of Concern
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Hydroxychloroquine as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Workers: A Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Trial
  4. Misconduct in science and medicine.EFORT open reviews · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Educational Impact of #IDJClub, a Twitter-Based Infectious Diseases Journal Club.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers.Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2021
    Article
  11. Halting 'research waste'.British dental journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR-IB criteria.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clearance of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine by the Seraph® 100 Microbinda Affinity Blood Filter -a device approved for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

The Lancet EditorsThe Lancet, London EC2Y 5AS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID32504543
PMCPMC7269709
OpenAlexW4206014212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.