SynthesisAnnals of botany2020
Impact of genome duplication on secondary metabolite composition in non-cultivated species: a systematic meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of insect herbivory resistance and tolerance to plant damage in the Brachypodium distachyon species complex.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Phytochemical Characterisation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The immediate metabolomic effects of whole-genome duplication in the greater duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza.American journal of botany · 2024Article
- Colchicine-Induced Polyploidy in Leguminous Crops Enhances Morpho-Physiological Characteristics for Drought Stress Tolerance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Multiomics comparison among populations of three plant sources of Amomi Fructus.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Genotypic variation rather than ploidy level determines functional trait expression in a foundation tree species in the presence and absence of environmental stress.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Comparative transcriptome and metabolome analyses of fourJournal of ginseng research · 2023Article
- Phenotypic and molecular analyses in diploid and tetraploid genotypes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Three chromosome-scale Papaver genomes reveal punctuated patchwork evolution of the morphinan and noscapine biosynthesis pathway.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Whole-Genome Doubling Affects Pre-miRNA Expression in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Orphan CropFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- A unified framework to investigate and interpret hybrid and allopolyploid biodiversity across biological scales.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsWhole-genome duplication is known to influence ecological interactions and plant physiology; however, despite abundant case studies, much is still unknown about the typical impact of genome duplication on plant secondary metabolites (PSMs). In this study, we assessed the impact of polyploidy events on PSM characteristics in non-cultivated plants.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare composition and concentration of PSMs among closely related plant species or species complexes differing in ploidy level. KEY
resultsWe assessed 53 studies that focus on PSMs among multiple cytotypes, of which only 14 studies compared concentration quantitatively among cytotypes. We found that whole-genome duplication can have a significant effect on PSM concentration; however, these effects are highly inconsistent.
conclusionOverall, there was no consistent effect of whole-genome duplication on PSM concentrations or profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.