Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504437›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

An overview of the municipal solid waste management modes and innovations in Shanghai, China.

Shijiang Xiao, Huijuan Dong, Yong Geng, Medel-Jimenez Francisco, Hengyu Pan, Fei Wu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Determinants of Satisfaction with Solid Waste Management Services: A Central-Local Comparison in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Cultural Consumption and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Waste Separation Management in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shijiang XiaoSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.
Huijuan DongSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China. donghj@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-8468
Yong GengSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.
Medel-Jimenez FranciscoDepartment of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Hengyu PanSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.
Fei WuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Key Programme 71690241National Natural Science Foundation of China 71974126Young Scientists Fund 71603165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) management and recycling has become an emerging issue in developing countries. Shanghai, the largest megacity in China, is well-known nationwide due to leading China's MSW separation and recycling. Therefore, this paper introduces the Shanghai mode for MSW management and its current situation to enrich existing MSW management studies. Results show that the total generation volume of MSW and amount of MSW generation per capita were 9.00 million tons and 372.16 kg in 2017, increased approximately eight-fold and four-fold compared with the data in 1978, respectively. The MSW treatment rate reached 100% since 2014, with incineration rate increased to 48.56% in 2017. The cost of MSW management after implementing MSW sorting regulation is increased to 985 CNY/ton, including 390 CNY/ton of MSW sorting cost. Then three key features and innovative MSW management modes, namely, mandatory MSW sorting legislation, Green Account program, and the Combined Network program are introduced. Meanwhile, two main challenges are urgent to be responded, including inadequate collecting vehicles and limited wet waste treatment capacity. Finally, policy recommendations on strengthening MSW recycling process, constructing complete terminal treatment industry, and making systematic policies were provided to respond existing challenges.

Indexed as

Refuse DisposalWaste ManagementChinaRecyclingSolid WasteSolid WasteCombined networkGreen accountMunicipal solid waste sortingRecyclingRegulationWaste treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.