ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2020
Clonal Origin Evaluated by Trunk and Branching Drivers and Prevalence of Mutations in Multiple Lung Tumor Nodules.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-Generation Sequencing vs. Clinical-Pathological Assessment in Diagnosis of Multiple Lung Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Multiple Primary Lung Cancers in Surgical Patients: Revisiting Martini and Melamed 50 Years Later.Cancers · 2026Article
- Integrative Sequencing and Proteogenomic Approaches to Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for Precision Diagnosis and Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Using molecular characteristics to distinguish multiple primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastases.PeerJ · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDifferentiation between intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) and multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) in patients with synchronous or metachronous lung tumor nodules is critical but challenging.
objectiveWe proposed an algorithm to evaluate clonal origin based on trunk (initiating) versus branching drivers and the prevalence of mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.
methodsDriver mutations were examined using next-generation sequencing in five trunk driver genes (BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, and NRAS) and three branching driver genes (ATK1, PIK3CA, and TP53).
resultsMutational profiling supported same clonality and likely same clonality, respectively, in 39 and 14 of 66 pairs of specimens with known identical clonal origin. Discordance of TP53 mutations (branching drivers) was observed in three pairs. Subsequent analyses of 30 pairs of synchronous or metachronous lung tumor nodules revealed different clonality and likely different clonality in 17 and 2 pairs, respectively, including three pairs with similar histomorphology; same clonality and likely same clonality in three and five pairs, respectively, including two pairs with different histomorphology; and inconclusive or noninformative results in three pairs.
conclusionWhile discordance of trunk drivers indicated MPLC in patients with synchronous or metachronous lung tumor nodules, discordance of branching drivers did not exclude IPM. Concordance of uncommon drivers supported IPM, whereas concordance of common drivers did not exclude MPLC. Additional recommendations from official organizations are needed to guide applications of molecular markers in defining clonality of multiple lung tumor nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.