Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504368›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

Germline Genetic Mutations in a Multi-center Contemporary Cohort of 550 Phyllodes Tumors: An Opportunity for Expanded Multi-gene Panel Testing.

Laura H Rosenberger, Samantha M Thomas, Suniti N Nimbkar, Tina J Hieken, Kandice K Ludwig, Lisa K Jacobs, Megan E Miller, Kristalyn K Gallagher, Jasmine Wong, Heather B Neuman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Contemporary Multi-Institutional Cohort of 550 Cases of Phyllodes Tumors (2007-2017) Demonstrates a Need for More Individualized Margin Guidelines.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. GermlineCancers · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laura H RosenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Laura.Rosenberger@duke.edu.
Samantha M ThomasDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Suniti N NimbkarBrigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Tina J HiekenDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kandice K LudwigDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lisa K JacobsDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Megan E MillerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kristalyn K GallagherDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jasmine WongDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Heather B NeumanDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Jennifer TsengDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Taryn E HassingerDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
James W JakubDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA paucity of data exists regarding inherited mutations associated with phyllodes tumors (PT); however, some are reported (TP53, BRCA1, and RB1). A PT diagnosis does not meet NCCN criteria for testing, including within Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (TP53). We sought to determine the prevalence of mutations associated with PT.

methodsWe performed an 11-institution review of contemporary (2007-2017) PT practice. We recorded multigenerational family history and personal history of genetic testing. We identified patients meeting NCCN criteria for genetic evaluation. Logistic regression estimated the association of select covariates with likelihood of undergoing genetic testing.

resultsOf 550 PT patients, 59.8% (n = 329) had a close family history of cancer, and 34.0% (n = 112) had ≥ 3 family members affected. Only 6.2% (n = 34) underwent genetic testing, 38.2% (n = 13) of whom had only BRCA1/BRCA2 tested. Of 34 patients tested, 8.8% had a deleterious mutation (1 BRCA1, 2 TP53), and 5.9% had a BRCA2 VUS. Of women who had TP53 testing (N = 21), 9.5% had a mutation. Selection for testing was not associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, p = 0.55) or PT size (p = 0.12) but was associated with grade (malignant vs. benign: OR 9.17, 95% CI 3.97-21.18) and meeting NCCN criteria (OR 3.43, 95% confidence interval 1.70-6.94). Notably, an additional 86 (15.6%) patients met NCCN criteria but had no genetic testing.

conclusionsVery few women with PT undergo germline testing; however, in those selected for testing, a deleterious mutation was identified in ~ 10%. Multigene testing of a PT cohort would present an opportunity to discover the true incidence of germline mutations in PT patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGerm-Line MutationPhyllodes TumorCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumans

Identifiers

PMID32504368
PMCPMC9945652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.