SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2020
The diagnostic and prognostic value of exosome-derived long non-coding RNAs in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Exosomal Long Noncoding RNAs in Diagnosis of NSCLC: A Meta-Analysis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of exosomal circular RNAs in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of tRNA-Derived Small non-Coding RNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Long noncoding RNAs in female malignancies: critical review of molecular mechanisms, clinical gaps, and therapeutic perspectives.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Roles of long non-coding RNAs in oesophageal cancer pathogenesis.International journal of experimental pathology · 2025Review
- Review
- Can Organoid Model Reveal a Key Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Tumors? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Functions of the bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathway through non-coding RNAs.Non-coding RNA research · 2022Review
- Small extracellular vesicles: from mediating cancer cell metastasis to therapeutic value in pancreatic cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022Review
- Non-Coding RNAs in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy: Focus on lncRNAs, circRNAs, and piRNAs.Cancers · 2021Review
- Emerging Roles of Long Noncoding RNAs in the Cytoplasmic Milieu.Non-coding RNA · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeExosome-derived long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as novel biomarkers are widely investigated in various cancers, yet results remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the diagnostic and prognostic value of exosome-derived lncRNAs in cancer.
methodsPubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang online databases were comprehensively searched for eligible studies up to January, 2020. To evaluate the diagnostic effect, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were pooled. Threshold effect, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were applied to explore heterogeneity. Deeks' funnel plot and sensitivity analysis were used to examine publication bias and stability of meta-analysis, respectively. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were calculated to assess the prognostic value.
resultsA total of 29 eligible studies involving 3882 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis, which included 26 on diagnosis and 11 on prognosis. For diagnosis analysis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.87), 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.84), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), respectively. Meta-regression revealed that the cancer type acted as the potential source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and Deeks' funnel plot indicated that results were relatively robust and had no publication bias. For the prognosis analysis, results suggested that overexpression of exosome-derived lncRNAs which upregulated in cancer showed a significant association with poor OS (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.79-2.71, p < 0.001). Conversely, overexpression of exosome-derived lncRNAs which downregulated in cancer was markedly related to better OS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.55, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis meta-analysis reveals that exosome-derived lncRNAs might serve as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for cancer. However, the clinical value of exosome-derived lncRNAs needs to be further confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.