Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504269›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2021

Definitions of Community for Individuals with Serious Mental Illnesses: Implications for Community Integration and Recovery.

Rohini Pahwa, Melissa E Smith, Erin L Kelly, Ryan J Dougherty, Helle Thorning, John S Brekke, Alison Hamilton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rohini PahwaSilver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square N., New York, NY, 10003, USA. rohini.pahwa@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1730-5623
Melissa E SmithSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3855-516X
Erin L KellyCenter for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-9661
Ryan J DoughertyLuskin School of Public Affairs, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-1214
Helle ThorningColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9926-3289
John S BrekkeSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3416-1120
Alison HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-7212
University of California, Los Angeles · USBehavioral Health Services · USNew York University · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While recent work on community integration for individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) has focused on the multi-dimensionality of community integration, it has not been fully rooted in how consumers define and experience communities for themselves. Guided by symbolic interactionism theory, the goal of the present study is to explore definitions of community as provided by individuals with SMIs, and to incorporate those definitions into a theoretical framework of community to inform community integration efforts in the context of mental health services and recovery. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2017 and September 2018 with 90 racially/ethnically diverse participants who were 18 years and older with an SMI and receiving community mental health services. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using ResearchTalk's "Sort and Sift, Think and Shift" methodology. Themes derived from participants' definitions of community included a structural aspect of people and places; a functional aspect of socializing, helping and receiving resources; and an experiential aspect of shared struggles and experiences, finding safety, and identifying with others. To this end, we propose a Structural, Functional and Experiential (SFE) model of community. The SFE model of community provides a conceptual framework and guidance for clinicians, researchers, policy makers and service stakeholders regarding the complexity and variability of community for their consumers, which is essential to their recovery. Application of the SFE framework for assessment and intervention is discussed.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersMental Health ServicesCommunity IntegrationHumansMotivationCommunitiesCommunity definitionsCommunity integrationSerious mental illnesses

Identifiers

PMID32504269
OpenAlexW3032973982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.