Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504230›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2020

Pilot performance of a dedicated prostate PET suitable for diagnosis and biopsy guidance.

Gabriel Cañizares, Andrea Gonzalez-Montoro, Marta Freire, Efthymios Lamprou, John Barrio, Filomeno Sanchez, José M Benlloch, Liczandro Hernandez, Laura Moliner, Luis F Vidal and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel CañizaresInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Andrea Gonzalez-MontoroInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Marta FreireInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Efthymios LamprouInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
John BarrioInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Filomeno SanchezInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
José M BenllochInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Liczandro HernandezInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Laura MolinerInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Luis F VidalInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Irene TorresServicio de Medicina Nuclear, Área Clínica de Imagen Médica, Hospital Univ. y Polit. La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Pablo SopenaServicio de Medicina Nuclear, Área Clínica de Imagen Médica, Hospital Univ. y Polit. La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Cesar D Vera-DonosoUrology Department, La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Pilar BelloServicio de Medicina Nuclear, Área Clínica de Imagen Médica, Hospital Univ. y Polit. La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Julio BarberaOncovision, Carrer de Jeroni de Montsoriu, 92, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Antonio J GonzalezInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC - Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. agonzalez@i3m.upv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-5626
Instituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ESOncovision (Spain) · ES

Funding

European Research Council 695536Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España TEC2016-79884-C2-1-RMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad DTS15/00152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) represents one of the most common types of cancers facing the male population. Nowadays, to confirm PCa, systematic or multiparametric MRI-targeted transrectal or transperineal biopsies of the prostate are required. However, due to the lack of an accurate imaging technique capable to precisely locate cancerous cells in the prostate, ultrasound biopsies sample random parts of the prostate and, therefore, it is possible to miss regions where those cancerous cells are present. In spite of the improvement with multiparametric MRI, the low reproducibility of its reading undermines the specificity of the method. Recent development of prostate-specific radiotracers has grown the interest on using positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for this purpose, but technological improvements are still required (current scanners have resolutions in the range of 4-5 mm).

resultsThe main goal of this work is to improve state-of-the-art PCa imaging and diagnosis. We have focused our efforts on the design of a novel prostate-dedicated PET scanner, named ProsPET. This system has small scanner dimensions defined by a ring of just 41 cm inner diameter. In this work, we report the design, implementation, and evaluation (both through simulations and real data) of the ProsPET scanner. We have been able to achieve < 2 mm resolution in reconstructed images and high sensitivity. In addition, we have included a comparison with the Philips Gemini-TF scanner, which is used for routine imaging of PCa patients. The ProsPET exhibits better contrast, especially for rod sizes as small as 4.5 mm in diameter. Finally, we also show the first reconstructed image of a PCa patient acquired with the ProsPET.

conclusionsWe have designed and built a prostate specific PET system, with a small footprint and improved spatial resolution when compared to conventional whole-body PET scanners. The gamma ray impact within each detector block includes accurate DOI determination, correcting for the parallax error. The potential role of combined organ-dedicated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and ultrasound devices, as a prebiopsy diagnostic tool, could be used to guide sampling of the most aggressive sites in the prostate.

Identifiers

PMID32504230
PMCPMC7275110
OpenAlexW3033429060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.