Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504204›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic primary and incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh (DynaMesh®-IPOM versus Parietex™ Composite): a single institution experience.

Andreas Domen, Cedric Stabel, Rami Jawad, Nicolas Duchateau, Erik Fransen, Patrick Vanclooster, Charles de Gheldere

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas DomenDepartment of General Surgery, Heilig-Hart Hospital, Mechelsestraat 24, Lier, Belgium.
Cedric StabelDepartment of General Surgery, Heilig-Hart Hospital, Mechelsestraat 24, Lier, Belgium.
Rami JawadDepartment of General Surgery, Heilig-Hart Hospital, Mechelsestraat 24, Lier, Belgium.
Nicolas DuchateauDepartment of General Surgery, Heilig-Hart Hospital, Mechelsestraat 24, Lier, Belgium.
Erik FransenStatUa Center for Statistics, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.
Patrick VancloosterDepartment of General Surgery, Heilig-Hart Hospital, Mechelsestraat 24, Lier, Belgium.
Charles de GheldereDepartment of General Surgery, Heilig-Hart Hospital, Mechelsestraat 24, Lier, Belgium. charlesdegheldere@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1217-7829
Hartcentrum Hasselt · BEProvince of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaparoscopic primary or incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh placement is a well-accepted and safe technique. Evidence for complications however remains inconclusive, and little is known about the occurrence of postoperative ileus secondary to postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions with different types of IPOM meshes used. Therefore, we retrospectively compared the occurrence of postoperative ileus between two of the different meshes used in our center.

methodsThree hundred seventy-five patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh placement, either with a DynaMesh®-IPOM (FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany) or a Parietex™ Composite mesh (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), at the Heilig-Hart Hospital in Lier (Antwerp, Belgium) between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively compared with regard to the occurrence of postoperative ileus until 6 weeks postoperatively. Baseline demographics and clinical data up to 6 weeks postoperatively of the patients in the two mesh groups are provided.

resultsThe DynaMesh®-IPOM mesh group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative ileus compared with the Parietex™ Composite mesh group with a cutoff limit at postoperative day 1 (n = 17, 6.8% vs. n = 0, 0.0%; P = 0.003) and postoperative day 4 (n = 13, 5.2% vs. n = 0, 0.0%, P = 0.006), even with a mesh surface area of ≤ 300 cm

conclusionOur results confirm current literature available regarding postoperative ileus secondary to postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions with the DynaMesh®-IPOM mesh. However, further research with well-designed, multicenter randomized controlled studies to evaluate the use and related complications of these meshes is needed.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIleusIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyCollagenHerniorrhaphyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPolyestersRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshCollagenparietexPolyestersAdhesionIncisional herniaLaparoscopyMesh repairPostoperative ileusPrimary hernia

Identifiers

PMID32504204
OpenAlexW3033572082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.