Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504192›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2021

The basics of data, big data, and machine learning in clinical practice.

David Soriano-Valdez, Ingris Pelaez-Ballestas, Amaranta Manrique de Lara, Alfonso Gastelum-Strozzi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Soriano-ValdezInstituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2353-1018
Ingris Pelaez-BallestasRheumatology Unit, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.
Amaranta Manrique de LaraBioethics, Health and Law Diploma Program, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-8770
Alfonso Gastelum-StrozziInstituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. alfonso.gastelum@icat.unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-5822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health informatics and biomedical computing have introduced the use of computer methods to analyze clinical information and provide tools to assist clinicians during the diagnosis and treatment of diverse clinical conditions. With the amount of information that can be obtained in the healthcare setting, new methods to acquire, organize, and analyze the data are being developed each day, including new applications in the world of big data and machine learning. In this review, first we present the most basic concepts in data science, including the structural hierarchy of information and how it is managed. A section is dedicated to discussing topics relevant to the acquisition of data, importantly the availability and use of online resources such as survey software and cloud computing services. Along with digital datasets, these tools make it possible to create more diverse models and facilitate collaboration. After, we describe concepts and techniques in machine learning used to process and analyze health data, especially those most widely applied in rheumatology. Overall, the objective of this review is to aid in the comprehension of how data science is used in health, with a special emphasis on the relevance to the field of rheumatology. It provides clinicians with basic tools on how to approach and understand new trends in health informatics analysis currently being used in rheumatology practice. If clinicians understand the potential use and limitations of health informatics, this will facilitate interdisciplinary conversations and continued projects relating to data, big data, and machine learning.

Indexed as

Big DataMedical InformaticsDelivery of Health CareHumansMachine LearningSoftwareData analysisDeep learningMachine learningMedical records analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.