Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504178›Full record

Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2020

Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years.

Alexander Barié, Thomas Sprinckstub, Jürgen Huber, Ayham Jaber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06190223 (Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Press-fit Tibial Fixation Technique Using Periosteal - Patellar Tendon - Bone Autograft), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06190223 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Press-fit Tibial Fixation Technique Using Periosteal - Patellar Tendon - Bone Autograft

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureArmsAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a periost-patellar-tendon-bone (PPTB) autograft and a tibial press-fit technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander BariéCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany. abarie@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6548-5606
Thomas SprinckstubCenter for Surgery B. Nimis and Dr. T. Sprinckstub, Zur Helde 4, 69168, Wiesloch, Germany.
Jürgen HuberCenter for Orthopedics of the Knee, Hopfenstraße 4, 69469, Weinheim, Germany.
Ayham JaberCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTB) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining momentum. Yet, long-term results that compare this procedure with established methods are lacking. The aim of this study was to report and compare long-term results of ACL reconstruction using QTB autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts, both anchored using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique. MATERIALS AND

methods60 athletes (Tegner score ≥6) with primary ACL rupture were prospectively randomized into two groups. 56 patients were evaluated after a mean duration of 12.2 ± 1.9 months (range 10-14) and 43 patients after 10.3 ± 0.2 years (range 10-11).

resultsOn final follow-up, 90% of patients scored very good and good results in the functional Lysholm score (mean 99 ± 7.1, range 74-100 points). Normal or almost normal IKDC score was reported by 84% of the patients (mean 97 ± 9.5, range 60-100 points). The activity level decreased in the Tegner score from median of 7 before injury to 6 after 10 years. The KT-1000 arthrometer showed a difference in the anterior translation of less than 3 mm (mean 1.0 ± 1.2, range - 1 to 5 mm) in 91% of the patients. Significant degeneration was radiologically detected in one patient per group. No tunnel widening was seen in any patient. Up to 97% of all patients were satisfied with the operative procedure. No significant differences were found in the mentioned parameters between the two groups and also in comparison with the 1-year results. The only significant difference was in the donor site morbidity. Significantly more patients in the BPTB group had complaints during kneeling both at 1 (p < 0.001) and 10 years (p = 0.019). Squatting was also subjectively more problematic in the BPTB group than in the QTB group both after 1 (p = 0.003) and 10 years (p = 0.046).

conclusionsThis study shows equally good functional, clinical and radiological long-term results for both hardware-free methods of ACL reconstruction. These results clinically confirm the safety of press-fit anchoring after 10 years. The failure rate in this study was very low, with only one re-rupture in 10 years. The increased donor site morbidity when using the BPTB autograft compared to the QTB autograft supports already reported data. It was also seen in this study for the implant-free press-fit techniques. STUDY

designProspective and randomized, level of evidence 2.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionTransplantation, AutologousAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesHumansKnee JointPatellar LigamentPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuadriceps MuscleReturn to SportTendonsACL reconstructionAthletesPatellar tendonPress-fit fixationQuadriceps autograft

Identifiers

PMID32504178
PMCPMC7505888
OpenAlexW3034105669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.