Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2020
Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years.
Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06190223 (Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Press-fit Tibial Fixation Technique Using Periosteal - Patellar Tendon - Bone Autograft), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Press-fit Tibial Fixation Technique Using Periosteal - Patellar Tendon - Bone Autograft
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quadriceps, hamstring and patella tendon autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate similar clinical outcomes, including graft failure, joint laxity and complications: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- How statistically fragile are randomized controlled trials comparing quadriceps tendon autografts with hamstring or bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- Femoral tunnel length does not impact outcomes following ACL reconstruction using a single-bundle quadriceps tendon autograft: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- Lower donor site morbidity with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autograft compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Quadriceps tendon autograft with or without bone block have comparable clinical outcomes, complications and revision rate for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts in ACL reconstruction yield comparably good results in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Trial
- Clinical outcomes of quadriceps, hamstring, and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Review
- Age-related differences in MRI signal intensity of the quadriceps and patellar tendons: Implications for ACL graft selection.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Sensory Deficit Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Could Provide a Solution.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Quadriceps tendon-bone vs all soft-tissue autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,748 patients.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Separate 2-Incision Harvesting Technique for Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Using a Circular Hollow Burr in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With an All Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Graft Had a Greater Return-to-Play Rate Than Patients Who Received a Quadriceps Tendon Bone Graft.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Cortical Tibial Press-Fit Fixation Demonstrates Comparable Biomechanical Performance With Interference Screw Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: A Porcine Model Biomechanical Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Global Variations in Surgical Techniques for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Approach.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Most Patients Report Acceptable Knee Function, Satisfaction, and Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum Ten Years After Quadriceps Free Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Association Between Autograft Choice and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- What's in a Name? Defining 'Failure' in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
- The Influence of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on the Healing of Bone Defects after Harvesting Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTB) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining momentum. Yet, long-term results that compare this procedure with established methods are lacking. The aim of this study was to report and compare long-term results of ACL reconstruction using QTB autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts, both anchored using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique. MATERIALS AND
methods60 athletes (Tegner score ≥6) with primary ACL rupture were prospectively randomized into two groups. 56 patients were evaluated after a mean duration of 12.2 ± 1.9 months (range 10-14) and 43 patients after 10.3 ± 0.2 years (range 10-11).
resultsOn final follow-up, 90% of patients scored very good and good results in the functional Lysholm score (mean 99 ± 7.1, range 74-100 points). Normal or almost normal IKDC score was reported by 84% of the patients (mean 97 ± 9.5, range 60-100 points). The activity level decreased in the Tegner score from median of 7 before injury to 6 after 10 years. The KT-1000 arthrometer showed a difference in the anterior translation of less than 3 mm (mean 1.0 ± 1.2, range - 1 to 5 mm) in 91% of the patients. Significant degeneration was radiologically detected in one patient per group. No tunnel widening was seen in any patient. Up to 97% of all patients were satisfied with the operative procedure. No significant differences were found in the mentioned parameters between the two groups and also in comparison with the 1-year results. The only significant difference was in the donor site morbidity. Significantly more patients in the BPTB group had complaints during kneeling both at 1 (p < 0.001) and 10 years (p = 0.019). Squatting was also subjectively more problematic in the BPTB group than in the QTB group both after 1 (p = 0.003) and 10 years (p = 0.046).
conclusionsThis study shows equally good functional, clinical and radiological long-term results for both hardware-free methods of ACL reconstruction. These results clinically confirm the safety of press-fit anchoring after 10 years. The failure rate in this study was very low, with only one re-rupture in 10 years. The increased donor site morbidity when using the BPTB autograft compared to the QTB autograft supports already reported data. It was also seen in this study for the implant-free press-fit techniques. STUDY
designProspective and randomized, level of evidence 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.