Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504130›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach.

Uli Fehrenbach, Safak Gül-Klein, Miguel de Sousa Mendes, Ingo Steffen, Julienne Stern, Dominik Geisel, Gero Puhl, Timm Denecke

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Uli Fehrenbach *Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany. uli.fehrenbach@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-3268
Safak Gül-Klein *Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Miguel de Sousa MendesDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Ingo SteffenDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Julienne SternDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Dominik GeiselDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Gero PuhlDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Timm DeneckeDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKrankenhaus Nordwest · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT (n = 33) and/or MRI (n = 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome.

resultsThe first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure (p = 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions (p = 0.294 to 1.000).

conclusionPreoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.

Indexed as

Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPortal VeinTreatment OutcomeComputed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingPortal hypertensionPortosystemic shunt surgery

Identifiers

PMID32504130
PMCPMC8197708
OpenAlexW3033696799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.