SynthesisPediatric surgery international2020
Biliary atresia in twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare spontaneous monochorionic dizygotic twins: a case report and a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Pooled it
- Genetic background and biliary atresia.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Review
- Research on biliary atresia and epigenetic factors from the perspective of transcriptomics: identification of key genes and experimental validation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Genetic Contributions to Biliary Atresia: A Developmental Cholangiopathy.Seminars in liver disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBiliary atresia (BA) in twins is extremely rare reported in the literature, but twin studies are useful methods of examining the associated factors of a complex disease. The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics and patterns of biliary atresia in twins from reviewing available articles.
methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were reviewed for related articles using the keywords ''biliary atresia'', ''twins'', ''monozygotic (MZ)'', and ''dizygotic (DZ)'', including relevant papers in the reference lists.
resultsThis analysis was extracted from 12 articles, with a total of 35 twin pairs included. BA was found in 36 out of 70 twin subjects (51.4%), of which had an even gender split. 97.1% twins were discordant, among 55.9% of which were monozygotic twin sets, indicating that BA may be related to genetic phenotype or penetrance. Isolated BA was the largest group with 27 (75%) affected twins. Only one pair of dizygotic twins (2.9%) demonstrate concordance for BA, and have one affected family member.
conclusionBA was found in nearly half of twin subjects with an even gender split. Isolated BA was the largest group, in which the number of monozygotic twins was similar with dizygotic twins, so the onset of the disease may not associate with the zygosity of twins. Most of twin sets had discordant disease presentation, especially monozygotic twins therein, emphasizing the role of epigenetic factor in the pathogenesis of BA. Future studies should take genetic testing among any twin sets in BA, especially the disease-associated mutations, thus be useful to investigate the etiology of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.