ArticleArchives of toxicology2020
Molecular basis of mood and cognitive adverse events elucidated via a combination of pharmacovigilance data mining and functional enrichment analysis.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutically relevant rimonabant exposure drives epigenetic remodeling in neuronal cells and rat brain tissue.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Disproportionality and Case-Based Evidence for a Possible Association Between Fluoroquinolones and Kounis Syndrome.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cross national pharmacovigilance analysis of drug-induced delirium: a comparative study using the US FAERS, Japanese JADER, and canadian CVAR datasets.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Neddylation related gene signature for prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer with integrated bioinformatics and experimental analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Multidimensional Assessment of Psychiatric Adverse Events Related to Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Real-World, Pharmacovigilance Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Nrf2-Independent Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Dimethyl Fumarate: Challenges and Prospects in Developing Electrophilic Nrf2 Activators for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Identification of key neuronal mechanisms triggered by dimethyl fumarate in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells through a metabolomic approach.Archives of toxicology · 2024Article
- Region-independent active CNS net uptake of marketed HFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Adverse event profile differences between pralsetinib and selpercatinib: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse events reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Gene Expression Profile as a Predictor of Seizure Liability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Navigating the complex landscape of benzodiazepine- and Z-drug diversity: insights from comprehensive FDA adverse event reporting system analysis and beyond.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Advancing drug safety science by integrating molecular knowledge with post-marketing adverse event reports.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced Mood- and Cognition-related adverse events (MCAEs) are often only detected during the clinical trial phases of drug development, or even after marketing, thus posing a major safety concern and a challenge for both pharmaceutical companies and clinicians. To fill some gaps in the understanding and elucidate potential biological mechanisms of action frequently associated with MCAEs, we present a unique workflow linking observational population data with the available knowledge at molecular, cellular, and psychopharmacology levels. It is based on statistical analysis of pharmacovigilance reports and subsequent signaling pathway analyses, followed by evidence-based expert manual curation of the outcomes. Our analysis: (a) ranked pharmaceuticals with high occurrence of such adverse events (AEs), based on disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and (b) identified 120 associated genes and common pathway nodes possibly underlying MCAEs. Nearly two-thirds of the identified genes were related to immune modulation, which supports the critical involvement of immune cells and their responses in the regulation of the central nervous system function. This finding also means that pharmaceuticals with a negligible central nervous system exposure may induce MCAEs through dysregulation of the peripheral immune system. Knowledge gained through this workflow unravels putative hallmark biological targets and mediators of drug-induced mood and cognitive disorders that need to be further assessed and validated in experimental models. Thereafter, they can be used to substantially improve in silico/in vitro/in vivo tools for predicting these adversities at a preclinical stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.