ArticleSkeletal radiology2020
The G2 research R.I.P. fragmenting bullet-radiographic features of a recently encountered projectile.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fragmenting projectiles: a case report and literature review of the G2 Radically Invasive Projectile.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gunshot wounds (GSWs) are an important cause of disability and death in the USA. Although radiography is limited in its ability to detect bullet types, a projectile introduced during the last decade, the R.I.P. bullet by G2 Research, consists of a base slug connected to 6 to 8 sharp trocars designed to diverge within soft tissue following impact, resulting in what we believe to be a unique imaging appearance that can be confusing to those not familiar with this particular projectile. Furthermore, this bullet is 100% copper, which may allow for safe imaging with magnetic resonance imaging if correctly identified prior to scanning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32504097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.