Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503972›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Multi-trait analysis of rare-variant association summary statistics using MTAR.

Lan Luo, Judong Shen, Hong Zhang, Aparna Chhibber, Devan V Mehrotra, Zheng-Zheng Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic mapping of developmental trajectories for complex traits and diseases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lan Luo *Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
Judong Shen *Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-1034
Hong ZhangBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8869-8671
Aparna ChhibberGenetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, 19446, USA.
Devan V MehrotraBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania, 19454, USA.
Zheng-Zheng TangDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53715, USA. tang@biostat.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-8087
Decision Sciences (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating association evidence across multiple traits can improve the power of gene discovery and reveal pleiotropy. Most multi-trait analysis methods focus on individual common variants in genome-wide association studies. Here, we introduce multi-trait analysis of rare-variant associations (MTAR), a framework for joint analysis of association summary statistics between multiple rare variants and different traits. MTAR achieves substantial power gain by leveraging the genome-wide genetic correlation measure to inform the degree of gene-level effect heterogeneity across traits. We apply MTAR to rare-variant summary statistics for three lipid traits in the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium. 99 genome-wide significant genes were identified in the single-trait-based tests, and MTAR increases this to 139. Among the 11 novel lipid-associated genes discovered by MTAR, 7 are replicated in an independent UK Biobank GWAS analysis. Our study demonstrates that MTAR is substantially more powerful than single-trait-based tests and highlights the value of MTAR for novel gene discovery.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLipid Metabolism

Identifiers

PMID32503972
PMCPMC7275056
OpenAlexW3033936781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.