Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503908›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

Fish Skin and Gut Microbiomes Show Contrasting Signatures of Host Species and Habitat.

François-Étienne Sylvain, Aleicia Holland, Sidki Bouslama, Émie Audet-Gilbert, Camille Lavoie, Adalberto Luis Val, Nicolas Derome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antioxidant potential and genomic adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

François-Étienne SylvainInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada francois-etienne.sylvain.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-0434
Aleicia HollandLa Trobe University, School of Life Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia.
Sidki BouslamaInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Émie Audet-GilbertInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Camille LavoieInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Adalberto Luis ValInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Ecofisiologia e Evolução Molecular, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Nicolas DeromeInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teleost fish represent an invaluable repertoire of host species to study the factors shaping animal-associated microbiomes. Several studies have shown that the phylogenetic structure of the fish gut microbiome is driven by species-specific (e.g., host ancestry, genotype, or diet) and habitat-specific (e.g., hydrochemical parameters and bacterioplankton composition) factors. However, our understanding of other host-associated microbial niches, such as the skin mucus microbiome, remains limited. The goal of our study was to explore simultaneously the phylogenetic structure of the fish skin mucus and gut microbiome and compare the effect of species- and habitat-specific drivers on the structure of microbial communities in both tissues. We sampled 114 wild fish from 6 populations of 3 ecologically and phylogenetically contrasting Amazonian teleost species. Water samples were collected at each site, and 10 physicochemical parameters were characterized. The skin mucus, gut, and water microbial communities were characterized using a metabarcoding approach targeting the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA. Our results showed a significant distinction between the phylogenetic profile and diversity of the microbiome from each microbial niche. Skin mucus and bacterioplankton communities were significantly closer in composition than gut and free-living communities. Species-specific factors mostly modulated gut bacterial communities, while the skin mucus microbiome was predominantly associated with environmental physicochemistry and bacterioplankton community structure. These results suggest that the variable skin mucus community is a relevant target for the development of microbial biomarkers of environmental status, while the more conserved gut microbiome is better suited to study long-term host-microbe interactions over evolutionary time scales.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost Microbial InteractionsAnimalsBacteriaBrazilCharaciformesCichlidsEcosystemMucous MembranePhylogenyRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSkinSpecies SpecificityRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmazonfishguthabitathostmicrobiomephylosymbiosisskinspeciesteleost

Identifiers

PMID32503908
PMCPMC7414953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.