Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503671›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2020

Intra-carotid arterial transfusion of circulatory-derived autologous endothelial progenitor cells in rodent after ischemic stroke-evaluating the impact of therapeutic time points on prognostic outcomes.

Kun-Chen Lin, Han-Tan Chai, Kuan-Hung Chen, Pei-Hsun Sung, John Y Chiang, Pei-Lin Shao, Chi-Ruei Huang, Yi-Chen Li, Sheung-Fat Ko, Hon-Kan Yip

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. "Time Is Brain" - for Cell Therapies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Brain repair mechanisms after cell therapy for stroke.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kun-Chen LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Han-Tan ChaiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kuan-Hung ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Pei-Hsun SungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
John Y ChiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Pei-Lin ShaoDepartment of Nursing, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chi-Ruei HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yi-Chen LiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Sheung-Fat KoDepartment of Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hon-Kan YipDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. han.gung@msa.hinet.net.ORCID 0000-0002-6305-5717
Chang Gung University · TWAsia University · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study tested the optimal time point for left intra-carotid arterial (LICA) administration of circulatory-derived autologous endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) for improving the outcome in rat after acute ischemic stroke (IS). METHODS AND

resultsAdult male SD rats (n = 70) were equally categorized into group 1 (sham-operated control), group 2 (IS), group 3 (IS+EPCs/1.2 × 10

conclusionEarly EPC administration provided better benefits on improving functional/image/molecular-cellular outcomes after acute IS in rat.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndothelial Progenitor CellsIschemic StrokeStrokeAnimalsMalePrognosisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRodentiaAngiogenesisEndothelial progenitor cellsIschemic strokeNeurological function

Identifiers

PMID32503671
PMCPMC7275327
OpenAlexW3033898138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.