ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2020
Ibrutinib dose modifications in the management of CLL.
Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Causal Inference Approaches to Estimating the Effect of Ibrutinib Dose Modifications on Progression-Free Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Review
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in CLL: the CLL-ZANU2024 Italian cohort.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Optimizing Ibrutinib Posology in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using a Semi-Mechanistic Pharmacometric Framework.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns After Discontinuation of Venetoclax or BTKis in the Frontline Setting Among Older Adults With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers of Ibrutinib Response and Toxicity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Insights from an Observational Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Final results on effectiveness and safety of Ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from the non-interventional FIRE study.Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Real-world use of BTK inhibitors for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: A retrospective observational database study.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2025Observational
- Preferences for First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatments: Results From a Multinational Study on the Perspectives of Patients and Physicians.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis of adverse drug reactions in 2020-2023: case studies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Ibrutinib and venetoclax in combination for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: synergy in practice.Blood neoplasia · 2024Article
- Article
- Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs of Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma in the US.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Real-world analysis of adverse event rates after initiation of ibrutinib among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Results from a Real-World Multicenter Analysis of 482 Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib: A Look at Racial Differences.Targeted oncology · 2023Article
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Blood advances · 2023Article
- A retrospective evaluation of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) management strategies in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Article
- Impact of Fixed-Duration Oral Targeted Therapies on the Economic Burden of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Aberrantly expressed Wnt5a in nurse-like cells drives resistance to Venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Cell death discovery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIbrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in 2014. Ibrutinib is often used to treat patients who are younger than the patients originally included in theclinical trials have additional unfavorable prognostic factors and suffer from additional comorbidities excluded from the original phase III trials. Our objective was to examine current clinical practices and their impact in this expanded population of CLL patients who often require adjustments in the standard prescribed dose and schedule of therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn extensive review of the medical literature was conducted to establish the consensus on ibrutinib dose modifications in patients with CLL. Twenty-nine studies were reviewed including fourteen clinical trials and fifteen "real-world practice" studies.
resultsThe average discontinuation rate was similar between clinical trials and "real-world practice" studies though the reasons for discontinuation differed. CLL progression was a more common reason for discontinuation in clinical trial studies while toxicity was a more common reason for discontinuation in "real-world practice" studies. Some studies have suggested worse outcomes in patients requiring dose reductions in ibrutinib while others have shown no change in treatment efficacy in patients requiring dose reductions due to concomitant CYP medications or increased immunosuppression post-transplant.
conclusionThe impact of ibrutinib dose modifications on clinical outcome remains unclear. Patients on concomitant CYP3A inhibitors should be prescribed a lower dose than the standard 420 mg daily, in order to maintain comparable pharmacologic properties. Further research is required to establish definitive clinical practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.