Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503582›Full record

ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2020

Ibrutinib dose modifications in the management of CLL.

Camille Hardy-Abeloos, Rachel Pinotti, Janice Gabrilove

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camille Hardy-AbeloosDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel PinottiLibrary Education and Research Services, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Janice GabriloveDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. janice.gabrilove@mssm.edu.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

MSHS Translational Science HubUL1TR001433 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WRIGHT, ROSALIND J · 2015 to 2019
$26.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIbrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in 2014. Ibrutinib is often used to treat patients who are younger than the patients originally included in theclinical trials have additional unfavorable prognostic factors and suffer from additional comorbidities excluded from the original phase III trials. Our objective was to examine current clinical practices and their impact in this expanded population of CLL patients who often require adjustments in the standard prescribed dose and schedule of therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn extensive review of the medical literature was conducted to establish the consensus on ibrutinib dose modifications in patients with CLL. Twenty-nine studies were reviewed including fourteen clinical trials and fifteen "real-world practice" studies.

resultsThe average discontinuation rate was similar between clinical trials and "real-world practice" studies though the reasons for discontinuation differed. CLL progression was a more common reason for discontinuation in clinical trial studies while toxicity was a more common reason for discontinuation in "real-world practice" studies. Some studies have suggested worse outcomes in patients requiring dose reductions in ibrutinib while others have shown no change in treatment efficacy in patients requiring dose reductions due to concomitant CYP medications or increased immunosuppression post-transplant.

conclusionThe impact of ibrutinib dose modifications on clinical outcome remains unclear. Patients on concomitant CYP3A inhibitors should be prescribed a lower dose than the standard 420 mg daily, in order to maintain comparable pharmacologic properties. Further research is required to establish definitive clinical practice guidelines.

Indexed as

AdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBiotransformationClinical Studies as TopicClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADisease SusceptibilityDose-Response Relationship, DrugEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsHematologic DiseasesHumansInfectionsLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasm ProteinsAdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBTK protein, humanCYP3A protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3AibrutinibNeoplasm ProteinsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsCLLdiscontinuationdosageIbrutinib

Identifiers

PMID32503582
PMCPMC7275592
OpenAlexW3033875770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.