Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503519›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Gender differences in specialty preference among medical Students at Aleppo University: a cross-sectional study.

Malke Asaad, Obada Zayegh, Joud Badawi, Zina Shikh Hmidi, Ahmad Alhamid, Mario Tarzi, Sarab Agha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Specialties preference by gender among medical students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malke AsaadAleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo, Syria.
Obada ZayeghAleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo, Syria.
Joud BadawiAleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo, Syria.
Zina Shikh HmidiAleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo, Syria.
Ahmad AlhamidAleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo, Syria.
Mario TarziAleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo, Syria.
Sarab AghaDepartment of Pathology, Aleppo University, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Mouhafaza, Aleppo, Syria. sarab.agha@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to identify gender differences in specialty preference and career choice among Syrian medical students.

methodA cross-sectional study comprising currently enrolled second, fourth and sixth year medical students at Aleppo University was conducted. Demographics, specialty preferences and factors influencing this decision were collected and analyzed.

resultsA total of 561 students (44% males, 56% females) responded to our survey (87% response rate). Surgical specialties (40%) and internal medicine (16%) comprised the two most common specialties chosen by males. In contrast, the majority of females preferred other specialties (17%), internal medicine (16%) and surgical specialties (15%). The most common factor affecting the choice of a specialty by both genders (74% females and 71% males) was 'A specialty that I like and find interesting'. Work/life balance and anticipated income were the second most common influencing factors by females (62%), males (67%), respectively. The majority of both genders supported the idea that medical students should be able to pursue any medical specialty they want, regardless of their gender. However, females more often believed that they had decreased opportunities for professional advancement based on their gender compared to males (33% vs. 4% respectively, p < 0.001).

conclusionsWe illustrated significant gender differences in specialty preferences and factors influencing this decision. While the majority of participants agreed that medical students should be able to pursue any medical specialty they desire regardless of gender, more women believed they had decreased opportunities for professional advancement based on gender. Policy makers should advocate for a culture of gender equity and develop educational programs to insure gender balance of physicians into different specialties.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceDecision MakingGender EquityAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSpecializationStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSyriaYoung AdultGenderGender differencesMedical educationMedical StudentsResidency preferencesSpecialty

Identifiers

PMID32503519
PMCPMC7275529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.