Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503492›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Women's autonomy in health decision-making and its effect on access to family planning services in Senegal in 2017: a propensity score analysis.

N M Sougou, O Bassoum, A Faye, M M M Leye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N M SougouDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal. ndeyemareme.sougou@ucad.edu.sn.
O BassoumDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
A FayeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
M M M LeyeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of women's autonomy in decision-making for fertility control has been highlighted by research. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of women's autonomy over decision-making regarding their health and access to family planning in Senegal in 2017.

methodsThe analyses in this study were carried out using data from the Senegal Demographic and Health Survey in 2017. The sample consisted of 8865 women aged 15-49. The propensity score-matching method was applied. Autonomy in health decision-making was considered the treatment variable. Matching was performed using confounding variables. The outcome variables were the current use of modern contraceptive methods and the existence of unmet needs. The common support condition had been met. The analysis was conducted using STATA.15 software.

resultsThis study showed that 6.26% of women had decision-making autonomy in relation to their health. For 80.33% of the women, their husbands/partners made health-related decisions for them. Decision-making autonomy increased significantly with the age of the woman (p < 0.05). In addition, 15.24% of women were using a modern method of contraception. An estimated 26.2% of women had unmet needs. Propensity score matching split the women into two groups based on autonomy over decision-making for their health. After matching, there was no longer a significant difference between women who were autonomous with respect to their decision-making and those who were not autonomous with respect to their current use of a modern contraceptive method. On the other hand, there was a 14.42% reduction (p < 0.05) in unmet needs for family planning in the group of women who were autonomous with respect to their health decision-making.

conclusionAutonomy in health decision-making would reduce unmet needs among Senegalese women. These results show the importance of accounting for gender in health interventions for the accessibility of family planning services.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPersonal AutonomyAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorDemographyFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePropensity ScoreAutonomy of decision-making for healthFamily planningSenegal

Identifiers

PMID32503492
PMCPMC7275346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.