Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503486›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Attitudes and perceptions about breastfeeding among female and male informal workers in India and South Africa.

C Horwood, A Surie, L Haskins, S Luthuli, R Hinton, A Chowdhury, N Rollins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

C HorwoodCentre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. horwoodc@ukzn.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-1423
A SurieIndian Institute for Human Settlements, New Delhi, India.
L HaskinsCentre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
S LuthuliCentre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
R HintonRHEdit, Geneva, Switzerland.
A ChowdhuryIndian Institute for Human Settlements, New Delhi, India.
N RollinsDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAIndian Institute for Human Settlements · INWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 2107/688752-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, over 740 million women make their living in the informal economy and therefore lack formal employment benefits, such as maternity leave, that can improve infant feeding practices. Returning to work is one of the biggest challenges women face to maintaining breastfeeding. This study aimed to explore attitudes and perceptions towards breastfeeding in the informal work environment among male and female informal workers.

methodsThe study used a qualitative research design. Purposive and snowball sampling was employed. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among men and women working in different types of informal jobs, in India and South Africa. Data was analysed using a thematic approach and the framework method.

resultsBetween March and July 2017, 14 FGDs were conducted in South Africa and nine in India. Most women were knowledgeable about the benefits of breastfeeding and reported initiating breastfeeding. However, pressures of family responsibilities and household financial obligations frequently forced mothers to return to work soon after childbirth. Upon return to work many mothers changed their infant feeding practices, adding breastmilk substitutes like formula milk, buffalo milk, and non-nutritive fluids like Rooibos tea. Some mothers expressed breastmilk to feed the infant while working but many mothers raised concerns about expressed breastmilk becoming 'spoilt'. Breastfeeding in the workplace was challenging as the work environment was described as unsafe and unhygienic for breastfeeding. Mothers also described being unable to complete work tasks while caring for an infant. In contrast, the flexibility of informal work allowed some mothers to successfully balance competing priorities of childcare and work. Sociocultural challenges influenced breastfeeding practices. For example, men in both countries expressed mixed views about breastfeeding. Breastfeeding was perceived as beneficial for both mother and child, however it was culturally unacceptable for women to breastfeed in public. This affected working mothers' ability to breastfeed outside the home and contributed to a lack of respect for women who chose to breastfeed in the workplace.

conclusionMothers working in the informal sector face multiple challenges to maintaining breastfeeding. Interventions are required to support feeding and childcare if global nutrition and development goals are to be met.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBreast FeedingEmploymentFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMothersPregnancyQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaWomen, WorkingBreastfeedingChild healthIndiaInformal economyMaternal healthSouth AfricaWorking womenWorkplace health

Identifiers

PMID32503486
PMCPMC7275335
OpenAlexW3033383300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.