Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503444›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Objective cognitive performance and subjective complaints in patients with chronic Q fever or Q fever fatigue syndrome.

Daphne F M Reukers, Justine Aaronson, Joris A F van Loenhout, Birte Meyering, Koos van der Velden, Jeannine L A Hautvast, Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld, Roy P C Kessels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sensitivity of the EQ-5D-5L for fatigue and cognitive problems and their added value in Q-fever patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daphne F M ReukersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Daphne.Reukers@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-6993
Justine AaronsonDepartment of Medical Psychology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Joris A F van LoenhoutDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Birte MeyeringDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Koos van der VeldenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeannine L A HautvastDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia H M van JaarsveldDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roy P C KesselsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

Q-support AMPHI150114-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary aim of this study was to compare cognitive performance of patients with chronic Q fever or Q fever fatigue syndrome (QFS) to matched controls from the general population, while taking performance validity into account. Second, we investigated whether objective cognitive performance was related to subjective cognitive complaints or psychological wellbeing.

methodsCognitive functioning was assessed with a neuropsychological test battery measuring the domains of processing speed, episodic memory, working memory and executive functioning. Tests for performance validity and premorbid intelligence were also included. Validated questionnaires were administered to assess self-reported fatigue, depressive symptoms and cognitive complaints.

resultsIn total, 30 patients with chronic Q fever, 32 with QFS and 35 controls were included. A high percentage of chronic Q fever patients showed poor performance validity (38%) compared to controls (14%, p = 0.066). After exclusion of participants showing poor performance validity, no significant differences between patients and controls were found in the cognitive domains. QFS patients reported a high level of cognitive complaints compared to controls (41.2 vs 30.4, p = 0.023). Cognitive complaints were not significantly related to cognitive performance in any of the domains for this patient group.

conclusionsThe high level of self-reported cognitive complaints in QFS patients does not indicate cognitive impairment. A large proportion of the chronic Q fever patients showed suboptimal mental effort during neuropsychological assessment. More research into the underlying explanations is needed. Our findings stress the importance of assessing cognitive functioning by neuropsychological examination including performance validity, rather than only measuring subjective cognitive complaints.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCognitionCoxiella burnetiiDepressionFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMemory, EpisodicMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsQ FeverBacterial endocarditisCognitive symptomsCoxiella BurnetiiNeuropsychological testPerformance validityPost-infectious fatigue syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32503444
PMCPMC7275429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.