ArticleBMC immunology2020
Can presepsin uniformly respond to various pathogens? - an in vitro assay of new sepsis marker.
Article in BMC immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Narrative Review: Research Progress and Future Directions of Presepsin in Neurological Prognostication of Adult Post-Return of Spontaneous Circulation (Post-ROSC) Cardiac Arrest Survivors.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Presepsin: An Emerging Biomarker in the Management of Cardiometabolic Disorders.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Anti-CD14 treatment in patients with severe COVID-19: Clinical and biological effects in a Phase 2 randomized open-label adaptive platform clinical trial.CHEST critical care · 2025Article
- Early Fever in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Are Presepsin and YKL-40 Valuable Diagnostic Tools?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- No Significant Differences in Presepsin Levels According to the Causative Microorganism of Bloodstream Infection.Infection & chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Changing trend of neonatal Ca/P/Mg status in a Chinese population.Translational pediatrics · 2023Article
- Performance of presepsin and procalcitonin predicting culture-proven bacterial infection and 28-day mortality: A cross sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPresepsin (soluble CD14 subtype) is a novel biomarker of sepsis used for early diagnosis. Originally, CD14 is known as the pattern recognition receptor for the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/LBP complexes, and the diagnostic value of this molecule for gram-positive bacteria, which contain less amount of LPS, is uncertain. To confirm its effectiveness in the diagnosis of bacteremia caused by gram positive bacteria, and to evaluate the interspecies difference of presepsin production against various bacterial strains, we conducted an in vitro assay to evaluate presepsin levels in response to five Gram negative and four Gram positive bacteria.
resultsWhole blood was yielded from five healthy volunteers and co-cultured with bacterial strains at 37 °C for 4 h. Twenty seven clinical isolates of nine species (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, P. aeruginosa, S. maltophilia, S. aureus, S. pyogenes, B. cereus, and C. striatum) derived from blood cultures of non-neutropenic bacteremia patients were used. Culture supernatants were harvested and presepsin levels were measured. The presepsin level in the gram-negative bacteria 273 (218-352) pg/mL was significantly higher than in the gram-positive bacteria 200 (143-275) pg/mL (p = 0.0002). The presepsin levels were significantly lower in C. striatum, in comparison to other bacteria, and S. pyogenes showed similar results. And the presepsin levels in P. aeruginosa were significantly lower compared to E. cloacae, K. pneumoniae, and S. aureus.
conclusionsPresepsin production can also be evoked by gram-positive bacteria, and interspecies differences of presepsin response may exist, which should be considered in the diagnosis of sepsis, especially in certain gram-positive bacteremia such as S. pyogenes or C. striatum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.