ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
Nanocomposites for X-Ray Photodynamic Therapy.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tutorial on Energy Transfer Mechanisms and Computational Methods in X‑ray Photodynamic Therapy with Metal Nanoclusters.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
- Simulation-Based X-Ray Spectrum Optimization for Dose Enhancement in X-Ray-Induced Photodynamic Therapy with NaLuFBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced Cancer Radiosensitization via Energy Transfer from Eu-Doped GdFACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Mini Review On: The Roles of DNA Nanomaterials in Phototherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- The wonders of X-PDT: an advance route to cancer theranostics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Energy Transfer between AGuIX Nanoparticles and Photofrin under Light or X-ray Excitation for PDT Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Current Advances in Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) and the Future Potential of PDT-Combinatorial Cancer Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Biodegradable hafnium-doped CaCONanomedicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- X-ray Activated Nanoplatforms for Deep Tissue Photodynamic Therapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Synthesis Optimization of BaGdFMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Oxygen-Sensitive Photo- and Radioluminescent Polyurethane Nanoparticles Modified with Octahedral Iodide Tungsten Clusters.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Emerging nanobiotechnology for precise theranostics of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Design Principles of Hybrid Nanomaterials for Radiotherapy Enhanced by Photodynamic Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics (PCCP) Section of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- BaGdFInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The Rare-Earth Elements Doping of BaGdFNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Progress in Nanocarriers Codelivery System to Enhance the Anticancer Effect of Photodynamic Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Catalytic radiosensitization: Insights from materials physicochemistry.Materials today (Kidlington, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has long been known as an effective method for treating surface cancer tissues. Although this technique is widely used in modern medicine, some novel approaches for deep lying tumors have to be developed. Recently, deeper penetration of X-rays into tissues has been implemented, which is now known as X-ray photodynamic therapy (XPDT). The two methods differ in the photon energy used, thus requiring the use of different types of scintillating nanoparticles. These nanoparticles are known to convert the incident energy into the activation energy of a photosensitizer, which leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species. Since not all photosensitizers are found to be suitable for the currently used scintillating nanoparticles, it is necessary to find the most effective biocompatible combination of these two agents. The most successful combinations of nanoparticles for XPDT are presented. Nanomaterials such as metal-organic frameworks having properties of photosensitizers and scintillation nanoparticles are reported to have been used as XPDT agents. The role of metal-organic frameworks for applying XPDT as well as the mechanism underlying the generation of reactive oxygen species are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.