Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503309›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Best Practice Standards in Animal-Assisted Interventions: How the

Victoria L Brelsford, Mirena Dimolareva, Nancy R Gee, Kerstin Meints

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hippotherapy in the Treatment of CMD and Bruxism in Dentistry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. How Autism Assistance Canines Enhance the Lives of Autistic Children.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria L BrelsfordSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Wharf East, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN5 7AY, UK.
Mirena DimolarevaDivision of Psychology, Bishop Grosseteste University, Longdales Road, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN1 3DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-1903
Nancy R GeeCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0710, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-9884
Kerstin MeintsSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Wharf East, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN5 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1048-5091

Funding

Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition title only
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) in educational and other settings have steadily increased over the last fifty years and a steep rise in AAI has been observed in many countries and settings in recent years. Surprisingly, while different providers and organisations provide a range of guidelines, no unified, standardised guidelines or risk assessment tools for AAI exist. This means that in practice AAI takes place in an unregulated manner and without a gold standard of best practice. In addition, knowledge of which interventions are effective is still scarce and the mechanisms of successful interventions are not yet fully understood. This is partly due to AAI being a relatively new research field and standards of research and practice have often lacked rigour in the past. Furthermore, knowledge and experience of providers undertaking interventions varies greatly as there is no standardised training either. We address the striking lack of standardised guidelines and procedures. In all AAI, high importance should be placed on safety and welfare of all involved. Children and other AAI participants, staff and animals should be given equal consideration when assessing risks and welfare needs. To ensure safe AAI worldwide, we provide urgently needed guidelines on best practice in relation to risk assessment, safeguarding and animal welfare priorities. The guidelines were developed for a large-scale longitudinal, randomised controlled trial AAI project and are relevant to AAIs within educational and other settings. We also provide the first set of comprehensive risk assessment and animal welfare tools to achieve consistent welfare and safety standards for best practice across educational and other settings around the world.

Indexed as

animal-assisted interventionsbest practice recommendationsdog-assisted interventionsriskrisk assessmentrisk assessment toolsafety standards

Identifiers

PMID32503309
PMCPMC7341237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.