ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Fully Automatic Landmarking of Syndromic 3D Facial Surface Scans Using 2D Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic Inference from Atomized 3D Morphometric Data: A Case Study using Kangaroos.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- A morphometric anthropometric analysis of the upper lip in adult Western Romanian population- a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The accuracy of automated facial landmarking - a comparative study between Cliniface software and patch-based Convoluted Neural Network algorithm.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Article
- Patch-based convolutional neural networks for automatic landmark detection of 3D facial images in clinical settings.European journal of orthodontics · 2024Article
- An interactive atlas of three-dimensional syndromic facial morphology.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Geometric learning and statistical modeling for surgical outcomes evaluation in craniosynostosis using 3D photogrammetry.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2023Article
- Comparing 2D and 3D representations for face-based genetic syndrome diagnosis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Automatic landmarking identifies new loci associated with face morphology and implicates Neanderthal introgression in human nasal shape.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Population-specific facial traits and diagnosis accuracy of genetic and rare diseases in an admixed Colombian population.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Using Optimal Transport to Improve Spherical Harmonic Quantification of Complex Biological Shapes.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022Article
- Decoding the Human Face: Progress and Challenges in Understanding the Genetics of Craniofacial Morphology.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022Review
- A Deep Invertible 3-D Facial Shape Model for Interpretable Genetic Syndrome Diagnosis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2022Article
- A landmark-free morphometrics pipeline for high-resolution phenotyping: application to a mouse model of Down syndrome.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- The Chromatin RegulatorFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- FaceBase 3: analytical tools and FAIR resources for craniofacial and dental research.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D facial landmarks are known to be diagnostically relevant biometrics for many genetic syndromes. The objective of this study was to extend a state-of-the-art image-based 2D facial landmarking algorithm for the challenging task of 3D landmark identification on subjects with genetic syndromes, who often have moderate to severe facial dysmorphia. The automatic 3D facial landmarking algorithm presented here uses 2D image-based facial detection and landmarking models to identify 12 landmarks on 3D facial surface scans. The landmarking algorithm was evaluated using a test set of 444 facial scans with ground truth landmarks identified by two different human observers. Three hundred and sixty nine of the subjects in the test set had a genetic syndrome that is associated with facial dysmorphology. For comparison purposes, the manual landmarks were also used to initialize a non-linear surface-based registration of a non-syndromic atlas to each subject scan. Compared to the average intra- and inter-observer landmark distances of 1.1 mm and 1.5 mm respectively, the average distance between the manual landmark positions and those produced by the automatic image-based landmarking algorithm was 2.5 mm. The average error of the registration-based approach was 3.1 mm. Comparing the distributions of Procrustes distances from the mean for each landmarking approach showed that the surface registration algorithm produces a systemic bias towards the atlas shape. In summary, the image-based automatic landmarking approach performed well on this challenging test set, outperforming a semi-automatic surface registration approach, and producing landmark errors that are comparable to state-of-the-art 3D geometry-based facial landmarking algorithms evaluated on non-syndromic subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.