ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Multivariate Monitoring Workflow for Formulation, Fill and Finish Processes.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Process monitoring is a critical task in ensuring the consistent quality of the final drug product in biopharmaceutical formulation, fill, and finish (FFF) processes. Data generated during FFF monitoring includes multiple time series and high-dimensional data, which is typically investigated in a limited way and rarely examined with multivariate data analysis (MVDA) tools to optimally distinguish between normal and abnormal observations. Data alignment, data cleaning and correct feature extraction of time series of various FFF sources are resource-intensive tasks, but nonetheless they are crucial for further data analysis. Furthermore, most commercial statistical software programs offer only nonrobust MVDA, rendering the identification of multivariate outliers error-prone. To solve this issue, we aimed to develop a novel, automated, multivariate process monitoring workflow for FFF processes, which is able to robustly identify root causes in process-relevant FFF features. We demonstrate the successful implementation of algorithms capable of data alignment and cleaning of time-series data from various FFF data sources, followed by the interconnection of the time-series data with process-relevant phase settings, thus enabling the seamless extraction of process-relevant features. This workflow allows the introduction of efficient, high-dimensional monitoring in FFF for a daily work-routine as well as for continued process verification (CPV).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.