Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503141›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

The Mechanical Microenvironment in Breast Cancer.

Stephen J P Pratt, Rachel M Lee, Stuart S Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptomic Association of COL3A1Pain research & management · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting breast tumor extracellular matrix and stroma utilizing nanoparticles.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Organoids technology in cancer research: from basic applications to advancedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Editorial: Cancer cell adhesion, metastasis, and the immune response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen J P PrattProgram in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Physiology, and Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum NCI Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Bressler Research Building, Rm 10-020 D, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Rachel M LeeDepartment of Physiology and Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum NCI Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Bressler Research Building, Rm 10-020 D, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-0422
Stuart S MartinDepartment of Physiology and Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum NCI Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Bressler Research Building, Rm 10-020 D, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Vu H. Duong · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
Training Grant in Cancer BiologyT32CA154274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Toni M Antalis, CURT I CIVIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.8M
Tubulin microtentacles in detached mammary epithelial cellsR01CA124704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MARTIN, STUART S · 2007 to 2025
$5.7M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN INTEGRATIVE MEMBRANE BIOLOGYT32GM008181 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI RIZZO, MEGAN A, TRUDEAU, MATTHEW C · 1987 to 2022
$4.9M
Targeting microtubule stabilization to reduce breast tumor metastasisR01CA154624 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MARTIN, STUART S · 2012 to 2023
$3.4M
Mechanically-Activated Calcium Signaling in Breast Epithelial Cancer CellsF31CA232393 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI PRATT, STEPHEN J. P. · 2018 to 2020
$65k
Rapid analysis of patient tumor cell drug responses to reduce metastatic riskI01BX002746 · VA · BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARTIN, STUART S · 2019 to 2024
–
Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-16-1-0052BLRD VA I01 BX002746NCI NIH HHS F31 CA232393NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154624NCI NIH HHS T32 CA154274NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008181NIH HHS 1F31CA232393-01NIH HHS R01-CA124704NIH HHS R01-CA154624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanotransduction is the interpretation of physical cues by cells through mechanosensation mechanisms that elegantly translate mechanical stimuli into biochemical signaling pathways. While mechanical stress and their resulting cellular responses occur in normal physiologic contexts, there are a variety of cancer-associated physical cues present in the tumor microenvironment that are pathological in breast cancer. Mechanistic in vitro data and in vivo evidence currently support three mechanical stressors as mechanical modifiers in breast cancer that will be the focus of this review: stiffness, interstitial fluid pressure, and solid stress. Increases in stiffness, interstitial fluid pressure, and solid stress are thought to promote malignant phenotypes in normal breast epithelial cells, as well as exacerbate malignant phenotypes in breast cancer cells.

Indexed as

breast cancerinterstitial fluid pressuremechanobiologymechanoresponsivenessmechanosensationmechanotransductionsolid stressstiffness

Identifiers

PMID32503141
PMCPMC7352870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.