Trial reportTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2020
Odour reduction interventions for simple pit latrines in rural Ethiopia: a randomized study.
Trial report in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pit latrines are promoted in resource-limited settings, but unpleasant odours may deter their use. In this study, latrines in rural Ethiopia were randomized to the addition of cooking ash, the addition of boiling water or neither. Study staff ranked odour on a 6-point scale before and approximately 24 h after intervention. Following intervention, odour grades were on average 0.2 points lower (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7 lower to 0.3 higher) in ash-treated latrines and 0.4 points lower (95% CI 0.9 lower to 0.1 higher) in boiled water-treated latrines, although the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). Larger studies might detect a smaller difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.