Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32502513›Full record

ReviewRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2020

PBPK model reporting template for chemical risk assessment applications.

Yu-Mei Tan, Melissa Chan, Amechi Chukwudebe, Jeanne Domoradzki, Jeffrey Fisher, C Eric Hack, Paul Hinderliter, Kota Hirasawa, Jeremy Leonard, Annie Lumen and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for theFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yu-Mei TanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. Electronic address: tan.cecilia@epa.gov.
Melissa ChanCorteva Agriscience, Haskell R&D Center, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE, 19714, USA. Electronic address: melissa.chan@corteva.com.
Amechi ChukwudebeBASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. Electronic address: amechi.chukwudebe@basf.com.
Jeanne DomoradzkiCorteva Agriscience, Haskell R&D Center, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE, 19714, USA.
Jeffrey FisherNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA. Electronic address: Jeffrey.Fisher@fda.hhs.gov.
C Eric HackScitoVation, 100 Capitola Drive, Durham, NC, 27713, USA. Electronic address: ehack@scitovation.com.
Paul HinderliterSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, 410 Swing Rd, Greensboro, NC, 27409, USA. Electronic address: paul.hinderliter@alexion.com.
Kota HirasawaSumitomo Chemical Co, Ltd, 1-98, Kasugadenaka 3-chome, Konohana-ku, Osaka, 554-8558, Japan. Electronic address: hirasawak@sc.sumitomo-chem.co.jp.
Jeremy LeonardOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 100 ORAU Way, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA. Electronic address: Leonard.Jeremy@epa.gov.
Annie LumenNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA. Electronic address: Annie.Lumen@fda.hhs.gov.
Alicia PainiEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, Ispra I, 21027, Italy. Electronic address: alicia.paini@ec.europa.eu.
Hua QianExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc, 1545 US Hwy 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801, USA. Electronic address: hua.qian@exxonmobil.com.
Patricia RuizCDC-ATSDR, 4770 Buford Hwy, Mailstop S102-1, Chamblee, GA, 3034, USA. Electronic address: pruiz@cdc.gov.
John WambaughUS Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA. Electronic address: wambaugh.john@epa.gov.
Fagen ZhangThe Dow Chemical Company, 1803 Building, Midland, MI, 48674, USA. Electronic address: FZZhang@dow.com.
Michelle EmbryHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, 740 15th Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. Electronic address: membry@hesiglobal.org.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling analysis does not stand on its own for regulatory purposes but is a robust tool to support drug/chemical safety assessment. While the development of PBPK models have grown steadily since their emergence, only a handful of models have been accepted to support regulatory purposes due to obstacles such as the lack of a standardized template for reporting PBPK analysis. Here, we expand the existing guidances designed for pharmaceutical applications by recommending additional elements that are relevant to environmental chemicals. This harmonized reporting template can be adopted and customized by public health agencies receiving PBPK model submission, and it can also serve as general guidance for submitting PBPK-related studies for publication in journals or other modeling sharing purposes. The current effort represents one of several ongoing collaborations among the PBPK modeling and risk assessment communities to promote, when appropriate, incorporating PBPK modeling to characterize the influence of pharmacokinetics on safety decisions made by regulatory agencies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPharmacokineticsRisk AssessmentAnimalsHumansDocumentationHarmonized reportPharmacokineticsPhysiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelRegulatory reviewRegulatory risk assessmentRegulatory submissionReporting templateStandardized report

Identifiers

PMID32502513
PMCPMC8188465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.