Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32502331›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2020

Comparison of confirmed COVID-19 with SARS and MERS cases - Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, radiographic signs and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ali Pormohammad, Saied Ghorbani, Alireza Khatami, Rana Farzi, Behzad Baradaran, Diana L Turner, Raymond J Turner, Nathan C Bahr, Juan-Pablo Idrovo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Human Riboviruses: A Comprehensive Study.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ali PormohammadDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Saied GhorbaniDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza KhatamiDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Rana FarziDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Behzad BaradaranImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Diana L TurnerCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Raymond J TurnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nathan C BahrDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Juan-Pablo IdrovoDivision of GI, Trauma and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
University of Calgary · CAIran University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRThe University of Kansas Health System · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Hepatic Response in Advance Age after Burn InjuryK08GM134185 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI IDROVO, JUAN PABLO · 2019 to 2023
$945k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM134185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWithin this large-scale study, we compared clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, radiographic signs, and outcomes of COVID-19, SARS, and MERS to find unique features.

methodWe searched all relevant literature published up to February 28, 2020. Depending on the heterogeneity test, we used either random or fixed-effect models to analyze the appropriateness of the pooled results. Study has been registered in the PROSPERO database (ID 176106).

resultOverall 114 articles included in this study; 52 251 COVID-19 confirmed patients (20 studies), 10 037 SARS (51 studies), and 8139 MERS patients (43 studies) were included. The most common symptom was fever; COVID-19 (85.6%, P < .001), SARS (96%, P < .001), and MERS (74%, P < .001), respectively. Analysis showed that 84% of Covid-19 patients, 86% of SARS patients, and 74.7% of MERS patients had an abnormal chest X-ray. The mortality rate in COVID-19 (5.6%, P < .001) was lower than SARS (13%, P < .001) and MERS (35%, P < .001) between all confirmed patients.

conclusionsAt the time of submission, the mortality rate in COVID-19 confirmed cases is lower than in SARS- and MERS-infected patients. Clinical outcomes and findings would be biased by reporting only confirmed cases, and this should be considered when interpreting the data.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeBlood Cell CountChinaCoughCOVID-19DyspneaFemaleFeverHospitalizationHumansLungcoronavirusCOVID-19meta-analysisMiddle East respiratory syndrome coronavirusSARS virussevere acute respiratory syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32502331
PMCPMC7300470
OpenAlexW3015815361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.